hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Chimera Revisited

  • Subject: Re: [iris-photos] Chimera Revisited
  • From: Randy Squires randysiris@juno.com
  • Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 19:33:43 -0800

 I am not sure I would call this a chimera. There would seem to be too much color blending on both sides.  This would seem to be more of an unbalanced broken color form.
Yes, you are exactly right. The more I thought about it I realized that there is
no split down the fall separating one color from the other. The other falls are
white ground speckled plicata. I think the Batik in it just showed up as an
unbalanced BC on this fall.
Randy z10 North Hills, CA

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index