Re: PHOTO: Liason and unidentified
- Subject: [PHOTO] Re: [iris-photos] PHOTO: Liason and unidentified
- From: "David Ferguson" m*@msn.com
- Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 19:29:21 -0700
- Seal-send-time: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 19:29:21 -0700
Hi,
I compared your photo with about 15 of 'Liason' from several different
sources, and I can find no reason to suspect that it is not 'Liason'.
Here is a shot of 'Liason' from my yard a few years ago. This is not
a glamour shot, but just how it usually looks in my yard. For me it is a
healthy grower (not extra fast, but by no means slow), and a very reliable
bloomer.
This is in central New Mexico in USDA Zone 7b/8a.
Dave F.
From: mahlberg s
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005
1:00 AM
Subject: [iris-photos] PHOTO:
Liason and unidentified
Hello, I purchased two iris last season. One was identified as
LIASON, but based on other pix I have seen, it seems to be a bit washed out in
color on the falls. Could this just be due to where the plant was grown, soil
conditions, etc? Or is this cv not LIASON?
Yahoo! Groups Links
|
- References:
- PHOTO: Liason and unidentified
- From: m* s*
- From: m* s*
- Re: PHOTO: Liason and unidentified
- From: "C* M*"
- From: "C* M*"
- PHOTO: Liason and unidentified
- Prev by Date: RE: retic pics
- Next by Date: RE: retic pics
- Previous by thread: Re: PHOTO: Liason and unidentified
- Next by thread: PHOTO: Liason and unidentified - OOPS