Okay -- Here it is in the right place.
----- Original Message -----
From: "J. Griffin Crump" <jgcrump@cox.net>
To: <i*@hort.net>
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 7:42 PM
Subject: Re: [iris] Re :HYB;Maternal Effect
> This is TORCHLIGHT PARADE (Reg, 2001). It was among 40-some seedlings
> salvaged after a neighboring farmer disced 2 years' worth of seedlings
> that
> I was growing on leased land. The markers had been scattered or
> destroyed,
> so its precise parentage was lost. However, from what I had been doing in
> my breeding program, I knew that it had WABASH on one side. The other
> parent was probably KAHILI, but one could only say that it was an unknown
> variegata. At any rate, it didn't bloom for 10 years. During that time
> it
> was moved once, from full sun to a semi-shaded area. Finally, it bloomed,
> but never giving more than two buds. Eventually, I moved it to full sun
> again. It began to increase rapidly, sending up many stalks, with as many
> as 11 buds. That year, it took "best seedling" at the Fredericksburg Area
> Iris Society show.
>
> It has never set seed, and until 2004, I was unable to get any pollen from
> it. Then I was able to coax some mushy pollen out of it and, much to my
> surprise, got a pod on a seedling that I consider important. It produced
> 10
> seeds, of which 6 germinated. True to their heritage, they haven't
> bloomed
> yet. But I'm patient. -- Griff
>
>
>> Paul Archer wrote:
>>
>> " We do know that some Iris don't bloom well if at all until they get
>> more
>> established. Generally this would apply to rhizomes from other
>> climates, but
>> why shouldn't this apply to seedlings as well? "
>
Statements made on and attachments (including but not limited to photographs of irises or people) sent to this list are the sole responsibility of the individual participants and are not endorsed by, or attributable to, or under the control of the moderator of this list.
