Re: to be or not to be

---

• To: iris-photos@egroups.com>
• Subject: Re: [iris-photos] to be or not to be
• From: "Harold Peters" harold@directcon.net>
• Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 13:32:27 -0700
• References: 000b01bfb5db$5ce15600$1114a5d1@suttons>

Of course you can see a lot more than we can on our monitors. However I would not recommend introduction because of the haft veining. There were several earlier blue amoena "to be or not to be" photos that I thought were much better.   I did receive your catalog today.    ----- Original Message ----- From: s*@lightspeed.net To: i*@egroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 8:13 AM Subject: [iris-photos] to be or not to be Need some help.  I really like the color and form of this flower.  The branching is tight.  Buds are adequate to good.  What do you all think of it?  Should it be intro'd or not? Thanks Mike

• Follow-Ups:
  • [PHOTO] Re: to be or not to be
    • From: "P* O*"

• References:
  • [PHOTO] to be or not to be
    • From: "M* S*"

• Prev by Date: Re: to be or not to be
• Next by Date: ADMIN: Love Bug Virus
• Prev by thread: Re: to be or not to be
• Next by thread: [PHOTO] Re: to be or not to be