[PHOTO] Re: 2001 intro
- To: i*@egroups.com
- Subject: [PHOTO] Re: [iris-photos] 2001 intro
- From: S* I*
- Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 19:03:08 -0400
- References: <002401bfb6df$202dd4e0$5314a5d1@suttons>
|
Very distinctive.
The bloom is not to my taste, but the garden properties are. Rebloom is sporatic here with the exception of Immortality and Rosalie Figge, so that doesn't matter to me Regards, Sandy Ives in Ottawa (z4ish and making his list, checking it twice...) Mike Sutton wrote: Potential introduction for 2001. What do you all think? 9 to 11 buds, 35" on thick, strong stalks. Very disease resistant, strong grower and non-fading. Foliage stays dark green all spring and summer. Fuzzy horns that add to the overall flower and yes looks very nice in the garden. Sporadic rebloom. J-264-EMike |
- References:
- [PHOTO] 2001 intro
- From: "M* S*"
- From: "M* S*"
- Prev by Date:
[PHOTO] 2001 intro
- Next by Date: Re: to be or not to be
- Prev by thread:
[PHOTO] 2001 intro
- Next by thread: Re: LA: LAURA LOUISE