[PHOTO] Re: 2001 intro | Fri, 5 May 2000 17:58:50" />
hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
 Navigation
Articles
Gallery of Plants
Blog
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Patents
Mailing Lists
    FAQ
    Netiquette
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
Links
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

[PHOTO] Re: 2001 intro


Very distinctive.

The bloom is not to my taste, but the garden properties are.

Rebloom is sporatic here with the exception of Immortality and Rosalie Figge, so that doesn't matter to me

Regards,

Sandy Ives in Ottawa (z4ish and making his list, checking it twice...)

Mike Sutton wrote:

Potential introduction for 2001.  What do you all think?  9 to 11 buds, 35" on thick, strong stalks.  Very disease resistant, strong grower and non-fading.  Foliage stays dark green all spring and summer.  Fuzzy horns that add to the overall flower and yes looks very nice in the garden.  Sporadic rebloom.  J-264-EMike

GIF image





 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index