[PHOTO] Re: Not Batik! Rare Edition | Thu, 22 May 2003 19:43:28" />
hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

[PHOTO] Re: Not Batik! Rare Edition

  • Subject: [PHOTO] Re: [iris-photos] Not Batik! Rare Edition
  • From: oneofcultivars@aol.com
  • Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 20:43:10 EDT

In a message dated 5/22/2003 11:34:05 AM Central Daylight Time, clc@cherylleigh.com writes:

Oddly enough, Rare Edition was one of the original 19 rhizomes that I
started with, sent by a friend in Texas in 1996.

Attached is a photo of Rare Edition. If you will notice underneath the middle bloom the newly opening fall peaking out compares to the falls your picture shows. Such a characteristic is pretty thin in chasing identity. Bloom season for Rare Edition here is very early and before Batik.

Your photos beard color compares favorably with RE and the most telling comparison is the tale tale tiny purple point on the fall at the tip of the beards.

Bill Burleson 7a/b

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

JPEG image

 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index