hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: RE:CULT: Batik? Yep!!! [kb zone 5b]

  • Subject: Re: [iris-photos] RE:CULT: Batik? Yep!!! [kb zone 5b]
  • From: "Neil A Mogensen" neilm@charter.net
  • Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 10:45:08 -0400

KB, I can see why you had difficulty recognizing the first photo Mike G
posted of the unusual flower of BATIK.

Chuck Chapman has posted in the past some very interesting data on how the
various plicata alleles work.

The "batik" broken color pattern is closely tied to, if not actually part
of, the plicata allelic series.  BATIK and others like it are notoriously
variable, never having two flowers alike.  As noted in both Mike
Greenfield's posts and those of Anita Moran and Dave Ferguson, the variety
has been observed to have sections or wedges of solid color, all white,
plicata and bc patterns.  All these are wedges that illustrate parts of the
allelic series in plicata.

The "solid" variant that gave rise to your reaction appears to be, or to
approach, the pattern of "zonal."  That, too, is closely allied with the
plicata allelic series, but just how hasn't been determined as yet to the
best of my knowledge.

When dealing with broken color, zonal or plicata irises (including
glaciatas, luminatas and luminata-plicatas) is is very difficult to say "is"
or "is not" to the identity of any of them from single flowers alone.

It was apparent to me that from the comment posted with the photo of the
BATIK, with both abnormal petal arrangement and count, *and* abnormal color,
the intent of the author was to express amazement at the range of
variability of the variety.  You were quite right in saying no, it doesn't
look like BATIK.  That was the point of the post.  The question mark,
followed by "Yep!!!" made that apparent to me.

Neil Mogensen  z 7  Reg 4  western NC mountains

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
What would our lives be like without music, dance, and theater?
Donate or volunteer in the arts today at Network for Good!

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement