hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive


  • Subject: Re: HYB:IMMxFOG
  • From: Linda Mann <lmann@lock-net.com>
  • Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 09:12:00 -0400

It seemed good on all of them so far - one more bloomed later - very
retro form yellow. Small flowers, short, disappointing in spite of form.

But blooms didn't last long, & with all the rain, didn't really get to
evaluate them very well.

I don't understand the relationship (or rather the lack of it) between
substance and how long an individual bloom lasts. How long to stay open
seems to be programmed into the cultivar, regardless of other traits.

<How is the substance on these?

<<maiden blooms >>

Betty W. >
Linda Mann east Tennessee USA zone 7/8
East Tennessee Iris Society <http://www.korrnet.org/etis>
American Iris Society web site <http://www.irises.org>
talk archives: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris-talk/>
photos archives: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris-photos/>
online R&I <http://www.irisregister.com>

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement