Re: hist TB Los Angeles

---

• Subject: Re: [iris-photos] hist TB Los Angeles
• From: &* F* <m*@msn.com>
• Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:29:18 -0700
• Seal-send-time: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:29:19 -0700

Gerry Snyder wrote:   <The iris I have seen labeled "Los Angeles" were not so clearly plicata as this. I can't say it is wrong, but I am suspicious.> I have to agree.  I don't know where this one came from, but I think you are correct.  I should have double-checked before I sent it!  Anyway, it looks more like 'San Francisco', but I think not that either.  It looks even more like 'Theodolinda'.  There are a lot of old plicatas out there though.   Thanks Gerry,   Dave Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/iris-photos/   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: i*@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

• References:
  • Spu
    • From: &* M* &*
  • hist diploid Queen of May again
    • From: &* F* &*
  • hist TB Los Angeles
    • From: &* F* &*
  • Re: hist TB Los Angeles
    • From: G* S* &*

• Prev by Date: Re: OT: sidewalk plant - 2
• Next by Date: Re: Spuria
• Previous by thread: Re: hist TB Los Angeles
• Next by thread: Re: rebloom