Re: REB: unknown bicolor again
- Subject: [PHOTO] Re: [iris-photos] REB: unknown bicolor again
- From: "jgcrump" j*@erols.com
- Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:41:22 -0500
As one who has often transgressed by
sending too-large photos, I have tried hard to find a way to reduce size and
keep quality. So far, I think I have found the key to keeping some amount
of detail while reducing size. In my case, using PhotoShop, I reduce
the dimensions of the photo, rather than the pixels, i.e., when using the Resize
feature, I reduce the document size (inches x inches) of the
photo by whatever percentage it takes to get the photo down to between 50
and 100kb, but leave the pixel dimensions alone. I'm attaching
to this message a photo which was originally 438kb, but is now -- at least
at the point of sending (heaven knows what the cybergremlins may do to it
enroute) -- 60.4kb. (This takes some experimentation and getting used to,
since PhotoShop shows this document's dimensions, for instance, as 2.8" x
3", and reducing it by 50% drops it to 1.4" x 1.5", seemingly thumbnail-size,
but it actually ends up about 4 1/2" x 4 3/4" on the
screen.)
Next, (brace yourselves, fellow
dial-uppers), I'm going to send the original at 438kb. I have
deliberately chosen a flower with delicate shadings -- and even a
guest aboard -- so the difference between the two versions can
be seen. If someone can reduce photos and keep better quality, I would
welcome learning how to do it. I've seen some pretty good-looking ones
here on our list that are under 100 kb, but still as much as 4x4" on the screen,
but don't know how it was done. Maybe someone will tell us.
Meantime, I, too, feel bad about having to send photos which by their small size
obscure lots of beauty. -- Griff
|
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: REB: unknown bicolor again
- From: i*
- Re: REB: unknown bicolor again
- From: C* B*
- From: C* B*
- Re: REB: unknown bicolor again
- References:
- RE: REB: unknown bicolor again
- From: "C* H*"
- From: "C* H*"
- RE: REB: unknown bicolor again
- Prev by Date: Re: REB: unknown bicolor again
- Next by Date: Re: Reb: unknown bicolor again
- Previous by thread: RE: REB: unknown bicolor again
- Next by thread: Re: REB: unknown bicolor again