This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under GDPR Article 89.

Re: finally a good yellow RE


What's up with the message?  No picture either, did anyone get the picture 
attached to this message?
Mike
(attached it again, just to make sure)
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "orders at Sutton's" <orders@suttoniris.com>
To: <iris-photos@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 7:19 AM
Subject: [iris-photos] finally a good yellow RE


> ------=_NextPart_000_0079_01C822A0.E23EB010
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
> boundary="=======AVGMAIL-473489664178======="
>
> --=======AVGMAIL-473489664178=======
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
> boundary="----=_NextPart_001_007A_01C822A0.E23EB010"
>
> ------=_NextPart_001_007A_01C822A0.E23EB010
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Been a frustrating journey to this point.  Funny thing is this wasn't the 
> i=
> ntended result....as usual.  We have been working for a nice formed yellow 
> =
> rebloomer and haven't had much success since Golden Immortal.  This is 
> maid=
> en bloom of (Viva Mexico X Bride's Blush) X Mtn. Sunrise.  I kind of like 
> i=
> t even though it isn't completely yellow.  Very, very wide and tightly 
> ruff=
> led.  Was going for an orange or bicolor with maybe some bleeding on the 
> fa=
> lls but got this instead.
> Mike Sutton
> ------=_NextPart_001_007A_01C822A0.E23EB010
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" 
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd&quot;>
> <html>
> <head>
> </head>
>
>
>
>
> <body style="background-color: #ffffff;">
>
> 
>
>    <div id="ygrp-text">
>            <p><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 
> Transitional//EN" 
> "http://www.w3c.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/loose.dtd&quot;>
>
>
> <DIV><FONT face="Arial" size="2">Been a frustrating journey to this
> point.&nbsp;&nbsp;Funny thing is this wasn't the intended result....as
> usual.&nbsp; We have been working for a nice formed yellow rebloomer and 
> haven't
> had much success since Golden Immortal.&nbsp; This is maiden bloom of 
> (Viva
> Mexico X Bride's Blush) X Mtn. Sunrise.&nbsp; I kind of like it even 
> though it
> isn't completely yellow.&nbsp; Very, very wide and 
> tightly&nbsp;ruffled.&nbsp;
> Was going for an orange or bicolor&nbsp;with maybe some bleeding on the 
> falls
> but got this instead.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face="Arial" size="2">Mike Sutton</FONT></DIV>
> </p>
>    </div>
>
>    
</html><!--End group email -->

JPEG image



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index