Re: TB: HYB: Correction
- Subject: Re: TB: HYB: Correction
- From: &* G* C* <j*@cox.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:32:21 -0500
Mike -- Thanks for the
reply. Here's your earlier posting, with the pedigree. (I save
certain ones.) It was identified as P40400001:
>Been working on this for a while but it has
hard to figure out how to develop it. Gilded edges on the standards don't
seem to be dominate, will keep working for more. >So far this is the
best one I have. Anybody have any ideas on developing gilt
edges?
>Mike Sutton
>seedling s-454-p: (Twice Told x J-214:
(Connie Sue)) X Ghio 983F
>7 buds
If gilded edges aren't
dominant, then we just have to figure on maybe a little longer work to pair
up the recessives, right? Other
gilded-edge varieties, sibling crosses, etc. I have a stalk up on a
seedling from Slovak Prince X Romania, Romania that I'm hoping will dodge the
freezes. I don't anticipate a gilded edge from this cross, but who
knows?
-- Griff
Zone 7 along the tidal Potomac near
Mount Vernon, in Virginia
|
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: TB: HYB: Correction
- From: &* a* S* &*
- Re: TB: HYB: Correction
- References:
- TB: HYB: Correction
- From: &* E* &*
- Re: TB: HYB: Correction
- From: &* t* &*
- Re: TB: HYB: Correction
- From: &* a* S* &*
- Re: TB: HYB: Correction
- From: &* G* C* &*
- Re: TB: HYB: Correction
- From: &* a* S* &*
- TB: HYB: Correction
- Prev by Date: Re: Reblooming siblings
- Next by Date: Re: TB: HYB: Correction
- Previous by thread: Re: TB: HYB: Correction
- Next by thread: Re: TB: HYB: Correction