hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
 Navigation
Articles
Gallery of Plants
Blog
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Patents
Mailing Lists
    FAQ
    Netiquette
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
Links
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: Sherman
iris-photos@yahoogroups.com
  • Subject: Re: Sherman
  • From: "dmeckenstock" <dmeck@eaglecom.net>
  • Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 20:50:34 -0000

 

OK, I see it now, It is a little confusing as written. The important thing is Sherman is in imbricata cytoplasm.

--- In iris-photos@yahoogroups.com, Linda Mann <lmann@...> wrote:
>
> As I understand it, the pedigree says that
>
> P-17 was a seedling from a cross between imbricata as pod parent and
> (M3) from timofejewii x reichenbachii as pollen parent.
>
> The resulting seedling (P-17) was then crossed back to pollen from the
> seedling M3, resulting in Sherman (sdlg AA-24-5)
>
> <P-17: (I. imbricata x M-3: (I. timofejewii x I. reichenbachii "Van
> Nes")) X M-3. >
>


  • References:

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index



 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement