Re: Re: photo credits
- To: i*@onelist.com
- Subject: Re: [iris-photos] Re: photo credits
- From: K* W*
- Date: Sun, 03 Oct 1999 22:08:52 -0700
- References: <001401bf0ddc$9b41a500$04010101@shauna-s-pii> <19991003195147.58290.qmail@hotmail.com>
From: Kenneth Walker eliminate the need for an explicit copyright statement. A work that can be copyrighted is now automatically copyrighted unless the author explicitly gives up the copyright. I'm not aware that posting to the internet is different from any other form of publishing in this regard. Of course, giving an explicit copyright notice does reinforce in peoples minds the ownership of the image and is not a bad idea if you are concerned about it. I have place most of the iris pictures on my home
page in the public domain, but I still
Ken Walker, Zone 9 Patrick Orr wrote: I can understand and sympathise with the photographer's feelings in this matter, but I strongly dissagree with them. When a photo is posted on the internet, without a copywright, it is considered Public Domain.--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ---------------------------- Get EXPERT CONTENT at ONElist! Join PROS&PUNDITS. For details go to: Click Here ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
- References:
- Re: of subject
- From: "S*"
- From: "S*"
[PHOTO] Re: photo credits
- From: "P* O*"
- From: "P* O*"
- Re: of subject
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: photo credits
- Next by Date: Re: Re: photo credits
- Prev by thread:
[PHOTO] Re: photo credits
- Next by thread: Re: Re: photo credits