hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: Re: Quality Standards
  • Subject: Re: Re: Quality Standards
  • From: Betty Wilkerson <Autmirislvr@aol.com>
  • Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 10:15:29 -0400 (EDT)


I'd like to add one piece of information to this conversation.  Some rhizomes will never be large.  It's just not in their DNA.  Just saying. 

<<What is the proper size?>>

Betty W.
KY Zone 6

-----Original Message-----
From: iris4u2 <iris4u2@comcast.net>
To: iris-photos <iris-photos@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sat, Sep 25, 2010 8:53 am
Subject: Re: [iris-photos] Re: Quality Standards

As a grower I would want to know when a customer is unhappy!  I had one lady in Tennessee express her disappointment with a few of the Iris I had sent believing they were on the smallish size.  I refunded the money for those varieties she felt were inferior.  When possible I will send double fans of those varieties which are smaller than I feel are up to proper size.  This year when haven't had any rain to speak of and the rhizomes didn't put on much growth at all.  No matter how much we watered it wasn't enough to compensate for the natural rainfall we so dearly missed.  Now I do treat my Introductions a little differently since I feel they should be expected to larger and be able to produce a flower the first year for the price which is being paid. 
What is the proper size?  Eggs are graded by size and priced accordingly.  The NW usually will produce a beautiful plant larger than that which is produced in the Mid West or East Coast.  This year for the first time the product coming from the NW was smaller due to the tremendous amount of rain they received during the Irises growing stage.  Should their product have been priced less because of size?  It still was in the ground just as long, just as much maintenance went into the care (maybe more because of the additional rain).  The loss of rhizomes was greater due to the rain maybe next year they will have to charge more because of the rain this year and the loss of revenue.  Should an Mid-West Iris be priced less because it doesn't reach the same size as a typical NW Iris?  If a grower carries an Iris you want and no want else has it shouldn't that grower be able to price the Iris, no matter what size they are producing at any price they feel is necessary to cover the cost of their operation?  If the grower has exceptional customer service should they be able to charge the price they feel is necessary to cover the cost of their operation and as long as someone is willing to purchase the product.  Supply, Demand and Customer Service in the Market Place isn't that what makes the economy work. 
Oh, since this is Iris Photos I'd better post a photo to make this legal. Photos from 2009 when we had great moisture and produced a very nice plant.  This year the product was smaller due to the great bloom season where the main fan plus increases were producing flowers then no rain so the increases remaining didn't put on as much growth. 
Iris4u Iris Garden
Denver, Colorado
----- Original Message -----

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement