This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under GDPR Article 89.

Re: Classification of Iridaceae

 

Speaking of Kew, everyone be careful using theplantlist.org for deciding what's a currently accepted species of Iris. Their new version recognizes more than 60 additional U.S. species, apparently due to an error in a contributing source that accepts every species published by Small and Alexander in Contributions of the New York Botanical Garden.

Sean Z


On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 1:01 PM, <C*@aol.com> wrote:
You may wish to cross check with Kew.
 
AMW
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Rodney Barton <r*@yahoo.com>
To: iris-species <i*@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sun, Feb 2, 2014 12:56 pm
Subject: Re: [iris-species] Classification of Iridaceae [2 Attachments]

Thanks all! It looks like the Wikipedia article is based on Goldblatt. So I'll run with that.

R

From: Lowell Baumunk <L*@iriscolorado.com>
To: i*@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, February 2, 2014 11:35 AM
Subject: RE: [iris-species] Classification of Iridaceae

 
Rodney,  You’ve probably already checked this out, but the Wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iridaceae gives a brief overview and links to items on all the genera….
 
From: i*@yahoogroups.com [i*@yahoogroups.com?] On Behalf Of Rodney Barton
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2014 9:30 AM
To: i*@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iris-species] Classification of Iridaceae
 
 
Hi All,
 
I'm thinking about a presentation for SIGNA on the "other" irids, and was considering organizing it by tribes within the family. I have Innes, 1985, who cites Goldblatt, 1971, as the most recent treatment of the family. Does any one know of a more recent treatment of the Iridaceae?
 
Rodney



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index