I whole heartedly agree Will.
Thanks for the hard work Dennis.
Regards,
Buddy Manuel
-----Original Message-----
From: iris-species@yahoogroups.com [mailto:iris-species@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of William Plotner
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 12:42 AM
To: iris-species@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [iris-species] (unknown)
Hi Dennis,
That is the perfect answer.....If anyone else complains just remind then
that the people out there bringing this stuff to the site arn't all
taxonominists.
AND...even if only taxomnominists could put this stuff up....they would
not
agree either.....and that is why it is so difficult for the rest of us.
Keep up the good work
All My Best
Will
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dennis Kramb" <dkramb@badbear.com>
To: <iris-species@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: [iris-species] (unknown)
> Filippo Dimatteo wrote:
>> Dear David,
>>
>> it's not so strange if there are some mistakes in the Database, as
>> everybody can upload his own informations to the site.
>> It would be helpful if someone can confirm or not the new uploads (on
>> the basys of the official checklist and nomenclature).
>>
>> Bob, Dennis, what do you think? Too much work, maybe...
> That's definitely NOT a responsibility that I want! Of course,
obvious
> mistakes can be easily corrected. And I do monitor the website
> regularly for such mistakes. But I am not an "iris policeman" who can
> say for sure if that's a real picture of Iris sicula or Iris
> purpureobractea. I have no idea!!! It's up to you guys to identify
and
> challenge the mistakes. At least that's my opinion. And that's why I
> designed the site to be that way.
>
> Dennis in Cincy
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
