Re: Prairie Iris Article


 

Yes, I agree with Eleanor. Issuing corrections is perfectly respectable, regardless of what sort of error one considers one has made. Max Leichtlin insisted upon publishing a detailed one in--as I recall-- The Gardeners' Chronicle about what he sent out as Iris Bornmuelleri. Sir Michael Foster wrote of the situation in his book on bulbous irises: 
 
"a little yellow Iris growing in the South of Cilicia, imperfect specimens of which many years ago the accomplished traveller and botanist, Mrs. Danford, sent to Mr. Baker. This he described as I. DanfordiÃ. Quite recently Dr. BornmÃller rediscovered the same plant in another region of Asia Minor, namely Amasia, and Mr. Max Leichtlin happily obtaining a supply, distributed it under the name I. BornmÃlleri, given by Haussknecht. Though the plants collected by BornmÃller vary somewhat, and Baker's description, being founded on imperfect specimens, was not complete, there can, I think, be little doubt that we are dealing here with the same species, and the earlier name Danfordià should therefore be used. "
 
As for I. lactea, well, if there is any one other little Iris species which has caused so much name shuffling and problems in the literature, I am not aware of it. Iris lactea, ensata, biglumis, pallassii-- and those just off the top of my head. I don't wonder that people get turned around. I have grown it, of course, and it is pleasant enough, but, in the immortal words of Saki speaking of the Balkans, it always tends to produce more bother than it can consume locally.
 
Happy New Year to you, Jim.
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Eleanor Hutchison <eleanore@mymts.net>
To: iris-species@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, Jan 11, 2011 10:25 am
Subject: Re: [iris-species] Prairie Iris Article

 
Morning Jim and all.
 
It took me a few minutes to recall which magazine article you're talking about.  I do now remember reading that about lactea in your article.  You could always get the editor to post one of those corrections.
 
Interesting that you mentioned lactea though, as just yesterday I was trying to figure out what crosses with it.  I got an OP seed pod off mine this past fall, but I'm pretty sure there was only 1 bloom stalk this year.  Perhaps it crossed with itself.
 
El, Ste Anne, MB Z3

From: g*@sasktel.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 1:27 AM
To: i*@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iris-species] Prairie Iris Article

 
To all of you who may have read my article I hope you can forgive me for mistakenly putting Iris lactea in the Spuria group.  I misread a description of this Iris which lead to such a result.  I was hoping someone would take some editing license with the article.
Jim in Saskatoon



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index