Re: Re: Pseudacorous seeds was Late additions to the seed exchange


 

My understanding is that, due to the confusing state of tall bearded
iris taxonomy, coupled with outright incomprehension and laziness,
some botanists lump ALL the garden beardeds into Ãgermanica,
regardless of the actual species involved. I assume that whatever
actual plants were observed to be invasive are fertile, wild-type TBs.

I found a TB clump several feet in diameter far from human habitation
in northern Michigan, with no evidence of recent flowering. The
rhizome I dug should flower this spring, and it'll be interesting to
see what old species or hybrid it turns out to be.

Sean Z

Quoting C*@aol.com:

>
>
> One of the Western states has I. xgermanica L on its invasives
> list. That's right, Granny's sterile blue flag, taking over the
> North American continent, one creeping rhizome at a time. Cracks me
> up. Of course, as a person with some Native American blood I do see
> the wisdom of a draconian approach to these things.
>
> The thing is, what I remember about the notice on the SIGNA page
> about no pseudacorus is the statement that only seed of named
> clones, by which I understood to mean registered cultivars, was
> wanted, not because of habitat issues, but because the type was
> already ubiquitous.
>
> AMW
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis Kramb <d*@badbear.com>
> To: i*@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wed, Jan 12, 2011 6:19 pm
> Subject: Re: [iris-species] Re: Pseudacorous seeds was Late
> additions to the seed exchange
>
>
>
>
> Down with pseudacorus!
> Save the natives! ;-)
>
> DK
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 6:15 PM, <C*@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Pseudacorus to the people!
>
> AMW
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Chapman <i*@aim.com>
> To: i*@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Sent: Wed, Jan 12, 2011 6:04 pm
> Subject: [iris-species] Re: Pseudacorous seeds was Late additions to
> the seed exchange
>
>
>
>
>
> I have been hybridizing Pseudacorous for a number of years and I
> will be introducing some in the near future, perhaps even this year.
>
> Included in these are a tetraploid that has flower about 7" across,
> and a white with outstanding bud count and branching. numerous
> seedlings of various colours, and doubles.
>
> Would these seeds be welcome or not?
>
> I was going to send some, but got behind.
>
> Chuck Chapman
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Plotner <g*@molalla.net>
> To: i*@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wed, Jan 12, 2011 5:53 pm
> Subject: Re: [iris-species] Late additions to the seed exchange
>
>
>
>
> ï
> The wild Pseudacorus plants are on the invasive list in many
> states...However the named cultivars and the Pseu crosses like Roy
> Davidson, Etc. are not included in any ban.
>
> All My Best
>
> Will
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Christy Hensler
> To: i*@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 1:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [iris-species] Late additions to the seed exchange
>
>
>
> ï
> I noticed that along with listings for pseudacorus in the seed
> exchange is a late listing for x pseudata ex 'Chance Beauty'.
>
> I was under the impression that pseudacorus or pseud crosses weren't
> going to be welcomed any longer so have been either giving away
> seeds from 'Chance Beauty', 'Shape Shifter', and the named white
> pseudacorus I have. Am I mistaken?
>
> Christy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index