Re: SPEC-X
- Subject: Re: SPEC-X
- From: K* W* <k*@astound.net>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 07:56:08 -0800
|
As I recall, those who worked to create
the category (I don't remember exactly who now) intended it to be
a broad category for hybrid iris that did not fit well into other
categories. This includes those that might be placed in another
category but did not meet modern expectations despite being judged
worthy of introduction by the hybridizer.
Ken On 1/9/2014 8:18 PM, Sean Zera wrote:
|
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: SPEC-X
- From: &* R* W* &*
- Re: SPEC-X [1 Attachment]
- From: &* P* &* &*
- Re: SPEC-X
- From: C*
- RE: SPEC-X
- References:
- SPEC-X
- From: D* K* &*
- Re: SPEC-X
- From: C*
- Re: SPEC-X
- From: S* Z* &*
- SPEC-X
- Prev by Date: Re: SPEC-X
- Next by Date: Seed Exchange
- Previous by thread: Re: SPEC-X
- Next by thread: Re: SPEC-X