Re: SPEC-X
- Subject: Re: SPEC-X
- From: "* P* "* <r*@embarqmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 14:04:50 -0500 (EST)
|
I actually doubt that that happens often. without the class being interpreted broadly the top awards would often go empty because of lack of competition. there have been years skipped because of not enough competitors.
From: irischapman@aim.com To: iris-species@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 1:37:36 PM Subject: Re: [iris-species] SPEC-X The problem I have is where iris are placed in this class, that could very well compete in another class. There have been a number of occasions where second or third generation plants that easily meet criteria for another class are placed in Spec-x. Then what happens is that they beat out stuff that are truly worthy of an award that are new innovations, and which meet spirit of the class. Partly on basis of wide distribution, and perhaps being grown by judges that grow no other Spec-x plants. Chuck Chapman |
- References:
- Re: SPEC-X
- From: &*
- Re: SPEC-X
- Prev by Date: Re: SPEC-X
- Next by Date: Re: SPEC-X
- Previous by thread: Re: SPEC-X
- Next by thread: Re: SPEC-X