Fw: Iris pallida cultivars and nomenclatural question
- To: <i*@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: [iris-species] Fw: Iris pallida cultivars and nomenclatural question
- From: &* F* <m*@msn.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 22:13:58 -0600
- Seal-send-time: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 22:13:58 -0600
|
Hi all. I think this didn't get through the first time I sent
it. It is a little out of sequence now, but I thought I'd go ahead and
send it anyway. It was originally send on Thursday the 24th.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks Bill for you comments on some of the cultivars I listed. It is
interesting that some of these posts are going to my work address and some
here. I think I confused Yahoo somehow.
Anyway, to address some of your comments. I did not know that Pink
Ruffles was offspring to No-we-ta. I should have thought to check some of
these for parentage in the registry (the few I have checked usually give nothing
or say "collected" with an approximation of the year). I have tried to
grow No-we-ta and Pink Ruffles, and both have been a bit slow and weak of growth
and neither has flowered. I suspect that this may have something to do
with parentage other than I. pallida, so your comments make sense in that way
too.
I have several I. pallida cultivars with the "pink" color similar
to 'Dog Rose', and will eventually get all of the colors marked in my
list. It seems to me that there are two basic colors in I. pallida.
One I call blue, the other pink. Of course both are somewhat purplish and
not truly blue nor pink (but close). I find that the blues tend to be of a
stronger fragrance. The plicatas come in one or the other color overlaid
on white. Most of them are "blue", but 'True Delight' is a nice "pink" on white
plicata pallida. 'Fairy' is a nice white that shows some
blue coloring in its styles and some shading on the hafts and claws (quite
pretty), but I'm not sure it is quite a plicata. It is interesting to me
that most people are most familiar with the "blues" such as Dalmatica and
Odoratissima, but the "pink" is what I grew up with as one of the "farm yard"
hand me down Irises, and I always thought of it as the "typical" I.
pallida. I still don't have the name for that "pink" cultivar, but have
eliminated quite a few names from contention. 'Pink Satin' hasn't flowered
yet for me, and is still in the running. Photos I've found are clear
enough to show it is a pallida, but not to identify the clone with mine for
certain.
As for the proper botanical name for the hybrids, regrettably the meaning
of the name has no bearing, only that it meats the criterion for a legal
botanical name of priority. It seems that I read somewhere that one of the
authors from the late 1800's or early 1900's had adopted the name I. squalens
for these hybrids, but I haven't been able to track down the reference
lately. From a botanical standpoint, all offspring of I. pallida x I.
variegata would bear that same hybrid name. This would be an issue apart
from the use of the names as cultivar names or their registration with the
AIS. It would give a convenient "handle" to use for such hybrids as a
category, although I think for horticultural purposes something else might be
nicer.
What started all this was a desire to group the like diploids together in
the garden to suit my personal preference for organization, and also a desire to
understand the origins and relations of the plants. The result has been
some interesting beds of plants, with the I. pallida beds rather striking for
it's generally rather tall slender stalks with relatively small flowers, and
with their often intense grape fragrance all bunched together and concentrated
into one area. The I. pallida bed I did at the Rio Grande Botanic Garden
is near the front entrance, and got a lot of attention this spring. Some
found them familiar from "Grandmas" garden, some found them quite different from
the TB's they are used to, and lots of people wanted to know where to get
them. The blends of near pinks, near blues, and whites is quite pleasing
to the eye, and the absence of yellows, reds, oranges, and browns makes the
color scheme less striking but somehow quite stiking. Incidentally the bed
at the garden is associated with a quasi-medieval planting at the front of a
Children's garden with a big dragon and a castle motif entry. Sort of
fun.
Anyway, Thanks all for you comments so far. I hope to hear more. Dave
Yahoo! Groups Links
|
- Prev by Date: Re: SIGNA Index
- Next by Date: Re: squalens, sambucina etc (a bit long) (was Iris pallida cultivars & nomenclatural question)
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: Iris pallida cultivars and nomenclatural question
- Next by thread: Iris-species photos/list owner