Re: I. douglasiana was I. tenax

Subject: Re: I. douglasiana was I. tenax
From: K* S* <k*@willapabay.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:15:54 -0700

Congratulations. And I'm pleased to know that my photo sleuthing came up with the same answer.

Kathleen

On Jun 16, 2011, at 6:48 AM, Rodney Barton wrote:

Mystery solved! I was able to connect with the Washington Park Arboretum and the iris in the photograph was indeed I. douglasiana. They also have I. thompsonii. If only I'd gone further down the path, instead of calling it a day.

Rod

<I_doug_clump.jpg>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: I. douglasiana was I. tenax
  - From: R* B* &*

References:
- I. tenax
  - From: R* B* &*
- Re: I. tenax
  - From: K* S* &*
- Re: I. tenax
  - From: R* B* &*
- Re: I. tenax
  - From: K* S* &*
- I. douglasiana was I. tenax
  - From: R* B* &*

Prev by Date: Re: Attachments
Next by Date: Re: I. douglasiana was I. tenax
Previous by thread: I. douglasiana was I. tenax
Next by thread: Re: I. douglasiana was I. tenax

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index