Re: Re: Iris abicans
- To: i*@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [iris-species] Re: Iris abicans
- From: "David Ferguson" m*@msn.com
- Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:58:26 -0700
- References: 21145D8C.748F0686.40F2269E@cs.com
- Seal-send-time: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:58:27 -0700
|
To expound on this a bit. The 44 chromosome Iris are technically
unbalanced tetraploids. They have a make up of 8 + 12 + 12 + 12
chromosomes. They come from a 40 chromosome parent crossed with a 48
chromosome parent (or as Sharon stated, perhaps an unreduced gamete from
a 24 chromosome parent). The 40 chromosome parent is an amphidiploid
(also technically a tetraploid, not unbalanced, but with two sets of 8 and two
sets of 12 chromosomes - so fully fertile - functionally diploid with two
matched sets of 20), and these are derived from a cross of a 32 chromosome
parent (or unreduced 16) with a 48 chromosome (or unreduced 24). So,
the plants end up with three sets of 12, and one set of 8. In the old
"wild" 44 chromosome types such as albicans the sets of 12 could all be from one
parent species, or from two. The set of 8 is most likely from I. pumila in
all cases, but if from an unreduced gamete could be from one of the 16
chromosome species (it had to contribute 16 to the 40 chromosome parent - only 8
of which make it into the 44 chromosome plants).
Anyway, the set of 8 chromosomes doesn't sort nor pair up properly with the
sets of 12 during meiosis, and this is probably the main reason for reduced
fertility. The odds are against success, but obviously success occurs
occasionally, as there are several cases where 44 chromosome plants have
produced offspring. The offspring can vary in chromosome number, depending
on how the chromosomes sort into the gametes during meiosis, and depending upon
what the "other" parent is. To me it seems most likely that the "wild" ones (albicans, germanica,
florentina, etc.) are derived from Near Eastern tetraploids crossed with I.
pumila, but these aren't the only possibilities. The tetraploids were
apparently cultivated and carried around by people, or at least this seems the
most likely explanation to why they have popped up as "wild" populations here
and there (not commonly) up all the way to the west end of the
Mediterranean. These crosses must have been rare, since
the wild TB Iris flower so much later than the dwarfs. Once
established though, they seem to have been very successful at surviving.
Seems the 44 chromosome hybrids were more successful as cultivars and at
naturalizing than their parent, since they are widespread and common.
The wild parentage thing is all supposition on my part.
Dave
Yahoo! Groups Links
|
- References:
- Re: Re: Iris abicans
- From: a*
- Re: Re: Iris abicans
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: pallida blue
- Next by Date: Re: Re: I. pallida loppio
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: Iris abicans
- Next by thread: Re: Re: Iris abicans