Re: The Iris Family Natural History and Classification
- Subject: Re: The Iris Family Natural History and Classification
- From: &* P* &* <r*@embarqmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:56:18 -0400 (EDT)
|
Presently it would be the definitive work on Iridaceae but it is expensive. I used it to create the summary of genera on the Iris Encyclopedia but Peter and others keep working and even Peter's book is now somewhat out of date with the current literature. I have been trying to keep the Wiki current but have not got much of the old stuff filled in as yet. As a printed volume it still is appreciated over the last monograph which was Clive Innes work. Peter does not go into detail about many species but instead addresses most everything at the generic level. Therefore it just compares the genus Iris to the other genera.
From: "Sean Zera" <zera@umich.edu> To: iris-species@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 2:01:37 PM Subject: Re: [iris-species] The Iris Family Natural History and Classification
Exactly... technical but very readable. The photos are biased towards South African species, but that's understandable.
Sean Z On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Chuck Chapman <i*@aim.com> wrote:
|
- References:
- Re: The Iris Family Natural History and Classification
- From: S* Z* &*
- Re: The Iris Family Natural History and Classification
- Prev by Date: Re: The Iris Family Natural History and Classification
- Next by Date: Re: The Iris Family Natural History and Classification
- Previous by thread: Re: The Iris Family Natural History and Classification
- Next by thread: Re: The Iris Family Natural History and Classification