Re: what is this?
- Subject: Re: what is this?
- From: &* A* C* <b*@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 21:28:13 -0400
|
> So I'm thinking Iris thyphifolia is not "good"
species.
>However, early blooming "siberian" irises are not uncommon in the
South of East Siberia. In the Russian tradition all they called now Iris
>sanguinea.
Yuri,
I remember you from when I was on Iris-Talk
some years ago. What you have brought up interests me quite a bit.
Something similar has happened with a Daylily [Hemerocallis]. A type of
Hemerocallis was found on Okinawa an described [I think] in the 1960âs.
Some give it the name Hemerocallis fulva Sempervirens, and others give it the
name Hemerocallis sempervirens. The real Sempervirens has Evergreen
foliage. The plants distributed under that name in the USA are something
else. They go dormant in winter, even in Florida and bloom too early
compared to the real thing.
I am wondering about Iris typhifolia
then. Could it be some variant of Iris sanguinea, or could the plants sold
in the USA be misnamed? If I am crazy, I hope someone tells me, but I do
find this interesting.
Mark A.
Cook
b*@bellsouth.net
Dunnellon, Florida.
|
- Follow-Ups:
- Pumila Atroviolacea
- From: E* H* &*
- Pumila Suslik
- From: E* H* &*
- Pumila
- From: E* H* &*
- Pumila Atroviolacea
- References:
- what is this?
- From: D* K* &*
- Re: what is this?
- From: J* M* &*
- Re: what is this?
- From: &* P* &*
- what is this?
- Prev by Date: Re: soaking seeds
- Next by Date: Pumila
- Previous by thread: Re: what is this?
- Next by thread: Pumila