Re: Wabash fertility

---

• To: i*@Rt66.com
• Subject: Re: Wabash fertility
• From: m*@earthlink.net (Mike and Anne Lowe)
• Date: Thu, 4 Apr 1996 23:09:39 -0500

Suzanne asked...

>Does anyone know if Wabash is fertile, especially pod fertile?

I suspect that Wabash is pod infertile, a quick trek thru the database
revealed no registrations with Wabash figuring as a pod parent.
Just for interest the following uses of Wabash's pollen did turn up.

CHILD                   POD PARENT                POLLEN PARENT
Wills 54                Whiting 42                E.B. Williamson 36

Mt. Mckinley            Amigo                     Wabash
R. Schreiner 47         Williamson 34             E.B. Williamson 36

Echo Valley             Ormohr                    Wabash (suspect! re L.Z.)
Muhlestein for Kerr 52  Kleinsorge 37             E.B. Williamson 36

Louise Blake            Madame Maurice Lassailly  Wabash
K. Smith 42             Cayeux 35                 E.B. Williamson 36

Criterion               Extravaganza              Wabash
Douglas 51              G.Douglas 43              E.B. Williamson 36


Best regards,

Mike Lowe, Virginia, USA

• Prev by Date: (no subject)
• Next by Date: Re: Winter Kill?
• Prev by thread: Wabash fertility
• Next by thread: Re: 10% bleach