Re: AIS:SYMPOSIUM IMHO
- To: i*@egroups.com
- Subject: Re: [iris-talk] AIS:SYMPOSIUM IMHO
- From: B*@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 20:34:42 EDT
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
GET A NEXTCARD VISA, in 30 seconds! Get rates
of 2.9% Intro or 9.9% Ongoing APR* and no annual fee!
Apply NOW!
http://click.egroups.com/1/7872/0/_/486170/_/967768509/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
In a message dated 8/31/00 9:40:26 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
wmoores@watervalley.net writes:
<< Donald mentioned poor-growing symposium winners. I think
some of the poor-growing TB's would be voted off if the ballot were
all-inclusive. There are much better LA's, arilbreds, Siberian,
medians, etc. than some of the TB's on the list. I wouldn't suggest
the Symposium ballot be used as a 'want list' because of the poor
growers on it and because it isn't all-inclusive. >>
Walter,
What I think we may need is a runoff ballot in addition to the current
system. Take the top vote getters under the current system, and combine that
into an all inclusive runoff vote.
Mark A. Cook
BigAlligator@aol.com
Dunnellon, Florida.
