Re: AIS: Registration List on CD
- Subject: Re: AIS: Registration List on CD
- From: p*@whidbey.net
- Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 17:46:48 -0000
Iris Moose,
I can only speak for my own 'goal'. I have used the electronic
versions of past checklists for looking up not just a description of
the cv in question, but whether/how it has been a successful parent
and what progeny it has produced. When you type in a name, that info
comes up as well in the parent names if the progeny are within that
timeframe. This is hugely helpful to me in deciding what parents I
might need for what possible end in hybridizing. Parentage in the
printed text is limited to that cv only.
Patricia
--- In iris-talk@y..., "Iris Moose" <irismoose@d...> wrote:
> Hey Linda,
>
> Of course you did not send me any hate mail. I have loved our
private
> discussions, which I have kept private. You are right I was
unaware of many
> of the previous discussions relating to digitizing the iris
information. I
> am however very familiar with the "struggles associated with
getting the
> registration data into a digital form," because I organized the
data from
> scratch for over 45,000 daylily cultivars. I do know every phase of
> starting with information on cards and previous printed lists,
organizing it
> electronically, and distributing via CD. "Been there--done that." :-
)
>
> No one should apologize if they have done nothing wrong. In fact,
almost
> entirely all my private messages I have received have been extremely
> positive and people want to see this project through.
>
> One question: "What are the goals that are expected to be achieved
by
> organizing the data electronically? And what is the order of
priority of
> these goals?"
>
> Cheers,
>
> Iris Moose
> Wake Forest, NC
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linda Mann [l*@i...]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 9:45 AM
> To: iris-talk@y...
> Subject: [iris-talk] Re: AIS: Registration List on CD
>
>
>
> I sent Bobby some offlist messages about this which I hope were not
> perceived as "hate" mail - that was certainly not my intent and I
> apologize if it was seen that way. His original posts sounded like
he
> was unaware of the sociological (?) history and struggles associated
> with getting the registration data into digital form which started
3?
> years ago. Of course Iris Moose makes some good points! Although
most
> are the same ones made when the subject first came up 'way back
when',
> it never hurts to say them again.
>
> I know better than to go offlist because it can so easily be
perceived
> as 'hate mail' even when that is not the intent. Apologies and much
> groveling if needed.
>
> Linda Mann east Tennessee soggy humid ick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Small business owners...
Tell us what you think!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/vO1FAB/txzCAA/ySSFAA/2gGylB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/