TB:standards

---

• Subject: [iris]TB:standards
• From: A*@aol.com
• Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 07:28:35 EDT
• List-archive: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris/> (Web Archive)

In a message dated 8/7/2006 10:08:44 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
rshadlow@yahoo.com writes:

<<open standards aren't as widely disdained as I may have  thought.>>
 
Brought this over from iris photos-Braggadocio. 
 
I have a personal bias against open standards, but even so I find some  
acceptable.  My real problem is FLOPPY open standards that either cave  inward 
after a couple of hours or splay out and lay on the falls.  
 
I'm noticing some irises with standards that are a great deal shorter than  
the falls.  This can create a look that is totally out of balance.  I  notice 
it more on bi-colored patterns.  

 
________________________________________________________
If you  don't cross them, you'll won't have to plant them! Bah! Humbug!! Hot 
summer!  
Betty W. in South-central KY Zone 6 ---
Bridge In Time Iris  Garden@website:
_www.thegardensite.com/irises/bridgeintime/_ 
(http://www.thegardensite.com/irises/bridgeintime/) 
_Reblooming Iris - Home Page_ (http://www.rebloomingiris.com/)  
_iris-photos archives_ (http://www.hort.net/lists/iris-photos/)  
_iris-talk archives_ (http://www.hort.net/lists/iris-talk/)  
_AIS: American Iris Society website_ (http://www.irises.org/)   

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: TB:standards
    • From: "J* G* C*"

• Prev by Date: Re: Innerst address
• Next by Date: Re: HYB:2006 Report-more
• Previous by thread: Re: Innerst address
• Next by thread: Re: TB:standards