Re: SATAN'S MISTRESS


From: Tom Tadfor Little <telp@Rt66.com>


Rick writes

>According to the AIS checklists...I do not have the the Aril
>checklist...
>Satan's Mistress is 1/4 aril and it was registered by the hybridizer as
>a tall bearded at his discretion.  I would assume that Satan's Mistress
>did not display enough aril characteristics to be registered as an
>arilbred.   

You're correct, Rick. And I am the responsible party. SATAN'S MISTRESS is
1/4 by parentage, but does not display any obvious aril characteristics. It
is a reddish black self, with TB form, although tailored. I suggested to
Gus Seligmann that it should be introduced as a TB rather than an AB, and
he concurred.

>> From: "Lewis,Shirlee E" <Shirlee.E.Lewis@kp.ORG>
>> 
>> The 1979 AIS Check list shows RED RAPPORT as an AB with its parentage
>> being
>> 598:(BANG x SAVAGE) x I. korolkowii v. brown and green
>> 
>> It looks like both iris may have been misregistered with AIS.  I checked
>> the 1989 checklist and don't show any corrections to RED RPPORT's
>> registration.


I don't understand this comment. Isn't this completely consistent with the
classification given in the ASI checklist?


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tom Tadfor Little                   telp@Rt66.com
Santa Fe, New Mexico (USA)
Telperion Productions  http://www.rt66.com/~telp/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help support ONElist, while generating interest in your product or
service. ONElist has a variety of advertising packages. Visit
http://www.onelist.com/advert.html for more information.



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index