Re: TB: Broken Color, Thornbird, etc.


From: "Rusty Thornsburg" <rtburg@hotmail.com>


Quote:
>Do I understand you to imply that because Bill Shear had not
>attended Judges Training he was arrogant and without authority in
>voicing his opinion of the worthiness of thornbird as a Dykes
>Medal Winner?

No. You misunderstood.

Quote:
>As a relatively new member of AIS I find that troubling.  Do the
>years of membership in AIS (which I assume Mr Shear probably has)
>and the fact he has written a book on Iris highly endorsed by
>many on this list and perhaps grown Iris longer than you have
>mean nothing?

I'm sure they mean something.  And yes, he has probably been growing irises 
longer than I've been alive, as many in the AIS membership have.  This, 
however, has nothing to do with whether or not one is a qualified and 
adequate judge of whether or not an iris deserves to win the Dykes 
Medal--for that we have AIS Judges.  It's OK to say "I don't like [insert 
flower name here]."  It is not, however, OK to say "Thornbird is a dog, its 
Dykes was undeserved"-in a public forum, no less- when one has no judging 
experience.  It's irresponsible to *assume* that just because oneself does 
not like a particular award-winning hybrid, that that particular flower is 
undeserving of awards.

Quote:
>Is the only valid authority to voice an opinion of the worthiness
>of an Iris Judging school?  If so how do you account for the fact
>that, with only one year growing Iris, in the Judging schools I
>have attended that I have gotten much higher scores on the test
>than many who are and have been judges for many years ?

I cannot account for your high test scores, Martha.  You missed the point.  
The only valid opinion as to the worthiness of a cultivar for awards is an 
AIS Judge.  They make the decisions.  Anyone who has a problem with them can 
either become a judge or quit the AIS.

>Is this the position AIS endorses?

No, it's my own position.  I just don't think it's right for people who 
don't know the juding criteria nor HOW TO JUDGE for said criteria to put 
down award winners because of personal preference.  It promotes disharmony 
within the society when those of us who are unqualified appoint ourselves 
judges--because what are we judging?  It's not the flower...it's the judges 
who voted for that flower.  That's the kind of behavior you'd expect to see 
in a 12th grade classroom, not in a 75 year old institution.  And if I could 
avoid that behavior in my classes last year, I know y'all can avoid it in 
the iris society.

Rusty

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------

Shop for your Valentine at eGroups.
<a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/SparksValentine6 ">Click Here</a>

------------------------------------------------------------------------




Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index