Re: RE:Hyb: Cytoplasmic inheritance
- Subject: Re: [iris] RE:Hyb: Cytoplasmic inheritance
- From: D*@cabq.gov
- Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:53:07 -0700
- List-archive: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris/> (Web Archive)
Now this brought a really interesting thought to mind. First the serious
comment. If the child was from another woman, it would have different DNA
than from the "legitimate" mother, but it still should have only the one
set.
The fun thought is this. What if Anastasia was adopted in this way? She
might have been part of the family after all!
Dave
Walter Pickett
<waltseed2@yahoo. To: iris@hort.net
. com> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: [iris] RE:Hyb: Cytoplasmic inheritance
owner-iris@hort.n
et
02/03/05 11:56 AM
Please respond to
iris
Pollen and sperm are much smaller than egg cells. So they carry no
cytoplasm to speak of. But instances of pollen, at least, carrying
chloroplasts to the embryo are not unknown. But I am not aware of it ever
happening in animals. but then I don't read the animal litterature as much
as the plant litterature.
It is not unknown for a family to adopt a father's child by another woman.
This mostly happened where a father has absolute control over what the
family does. And maybe under that Czar such was the case.
But the percentage given seems really high to me.
Walter
Oneofcultivars@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 2/2/2005 5:41:27 PM Central Standard Time,
irischapman@netscape.net writes:
> So if mitochondria comes only from the mother how does this happen, 2
> sets that is.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index