Re: Re: phonetic pronunciation
- Subject: Re: [iris] Re: phonetic pronunciation
- From: C*@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:10:50 EST
- List-archive: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris/> (Web Archive)
In a message dated 2/22/05 10:03:45 AM Eastern Standard Time,
rpries@sbcglobal.net writes:
<<But even then it was stressed that Botanical Latin was a different language
than Classical Latin. Rules, such as putting the accent on the penultimate
syllable, seemed sacrosanct. Today I picked up one of the leading Botany
textbooks in the country and found that there is no recommendation as to
pronunciation at all except that it should conform to the pronunciation of your native
tongue. In other words you can pronounce Botanical Latin the way you would
naturally pronounce the words in your native language. That does not mean
pronunciations with extra syllables and letters that are not there would be
acceptable. But it does mean that no one has the authority to say you are
pronouncing a botanical name incorrectly, provided it is clear as to what you are
saying. I have a tendency to bend the old rules when it makes sense to me.
Far example Iris versicolor means many colored iris. If I pronounced it by the
old rules it would sound like EYE RIS VER SICK O LOR. But it makes more
sense to me to pronounce it EYE RIS VERSI COLOR. Today either way is considered
acceptable. The most important consideration is whether communication is taking
place.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index