Re: HYB: registered rebloomers
In a message dated 2/5/2008 9:07:22 AM Eastern Standard Time,
lmann@lock-net.com writes:
Loic, maybe that's just year to year variability?
And was there not some noise at one point about urging more circumspection
generally in denominating cultivars as "rebloomers" so that the rail may,
perhaps, now be perceived to be somewhat higher than previously, viz a viz the
normative expectations ...or am I misremembering?
After all, one understands that gains are being made, and it follows that
the standard within the category must also be evolving. Perhaps because, to the
discriminating, some newer rebloomers are better rebloomers, fewer lesser
cultivars are perceived to be worthy of introduction, so that whereas the
quantities of introductions are more or less static, the overall quality of the
introductions is higher.
Cordially,
Anner Whitehead
Richmond VA USA USDA
**************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music.
(http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp003000000025
48)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index
