iris@hort.net
- Subject: Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- From: C* C* <i*@aim.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:18:33 -0500 (EST)
I'd like the references for four pumilla pairing with 4 TB. that would be interesting.
In this situation I would think that what you would have would be 12 bivalents and 20 univalents. (Unless there really are 4 chromosomes which can pair up). But a 12 +4 univalent and a 8 + 4 univalent would still be unviable. Just too many univalents. Some would be silenced (that is just the way it happens) thus plant would not be able to live. Too many enzymes and proteins missing.
With unmatched chomosomes of close to full sets, as long as there is one of each chromosomes for each set, there can be some viability. There is various ways this can happen. Such as the sets with one less chromosome is often a joining of two other chromosomes. Thus he two in other plant, that have joined, would have coresponding regions, and can line up with the corresponding one. then during cross over , the two can do a disjunctive joining, loose the extra centomere and become a functional , rejoined chromosome. In this case there will be a section of of a chromosome without centromere , which can randomly move into one cell. And as it doesn't have a centromere, it will be lost in meiosis.
You need a full set of chromosomes, and this depends how they are packed in the chromosomes. Some can function as univalents but as long as they are not part of the "silenced" genome, where this happens.
A lot more possibilities, which just don't work. I'm not going to go into them right now.
So after all this consideration, it is why I still think a number of fertile are large SDB, that is 12/12/8/8. A count of some of these fertile IB would be interesting. I have gotten a few tall SDBand have seen several of them registered as IB, so I know that there are some out there. But that doesn't mean all of the fertile IB are of this amphidiploid type.
Some of these fertile IB are fertile in IB X IB crosses , Which seems as if it would only be possible if they were amphidiploid.
Chuck Chapman -----Original Message----- From: Tom Waters <irises@telp.com> To: iris <iris@hort.net> Sent: Tue, Feb 26, 2013 4:47 pm Subject: Re: [iris] Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)There have been observations of four pumila chromosomes pairing with four TB chromosomes in IBs and (I think) 36-chromosome MDBs. These unbalanced
tetraploids are not completely infertile by any means, and relatively fertile ones seem to be becoming more common with time, which I have noexplanation for. Some used to give a "rule of thumb" that if the bivalents outnumber the univalents, some fertility can be expected. If you have the pairing of four chromosomes I mentioned, an IB has 12+4=16 bivalents, and
8+4=12 univalents. We also see partial fertility in the 1/4 aril arilbreds. I think the supposition is that unpaired chromosomes do not necessarilystop the plant from making gametes, and the unpaired ones just end up in the gametes randomly. It's possible to have a viable plant with one of two extra chromosomes (or one or two missing ones); these are aneuploids. So
the fertile gametes from these unbalanced tetraploids are those thatrandomly receive an approximately complete set. The probability of that is
small, but can be great enough to get some good seeds in some cases. Tom Tom Waters Telperion Oasis ~ www.telp.com/irises Cuyamungue, New Mexico, USA (zone 6) ---------------------------------------- From: "Bill Chaney" <billchaney@ymail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:02 PM To: "iris@hort.net" <iris@hort.net> Subject: Re: [iris] Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question) I don't want to distract the discussion that is ongoing, but I can't resistjumping in when Chuck brings up the 12/12/8/8 ploidy because I am trying
to understand how some of these IBs are so fertile with TBs and MTBs. Especially if the 12/12 side comes from aphylla background. Would anyone care to comment on that or point me to a good source of information? Thanks Bill ________________________________ From: Chuck Chapman To: iris@hort.net Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 8:06 AM Subject: Re: [iris] Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question) Amphidiploid is 12/12/8/8 these are SDB There can't be cross overs between any chromosomefrom 8 set and 12 set, as they never pair up in meiosis. Crossovers only
occurin paired chromosomes. No pairs = no crossovers. Like, never ever. If they
ever did, their would be unbalanced chromosomes, and it wouldn't be viable. that is the meiotic cell would die, or any zygote formed would die. IB is12/12/12/8 So can be pumilla spot, on one of the chromosomes from the "8
chromosomes" set. RE; Chocolate Truffle. TB X pumilla = SDB No exceptions. And for kickers, ruffles" a recessive trait that just isn't present in pumilla species. So where are genes for ruffles coming from? Hell's Fire is a reddishblack, with multiple dosages of Ae (check pedigree) Thus all seedlings
will be purple in a cross with a yellow. So are you still believing this pedigree? Chuck Chapman -----Original Message----- From: Linda Mann To: iris Sent: Tue, Feb 26, 2013 10:41 am Subject: Re: [iris] Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question) Amphidiploid version could. On 2/26/2013 9:09 AM, Chuck Chapman wrote:
The
pumilla spot is only on the "8 chromosome" set. So can't show up in TB, Agree, spots are interesting. TB e-register from pumila, first generation. There is another one registered as a TB, but class is probably a typo - it's IB height. Others SDB breeding? fertile IBs? cross overs? CHOCOLATE TRUFFLE (Mark Grumbine, R. 2006) Sdlg. MG04-407-7. TB, 29" (74 cm), EM S. light yellow-brown; F. dark mahogany brown, light yellow area around beards and shoulders; beards orange; ruffled. Hells Fire X I. pumila, yellow eagerly waiting to see the '39 checklist (Mike, any more TBs registered from that era from pumilas?) Are there more? What about the pumila spot work that Blyth was doing, trying to bring spot 'up' to TB size? Zing Me. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
- References:
- Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- From: &* W* &*
- Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- Next by Date: Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- Next by thread: Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)