iris@hort.net
- Subject: Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- From: L* M* <l*@lock-net.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:20:31 -0500
Sooo, with all the bazillion afore mentioned crosses with spotted pumilas, not 'moving' the pumila spot pattern (as opposed to the variegata spot), maybe there are some pumilas out there that match better with some of the existing genetically scrambled up TBs.
Theoretically.Speaking of the (theoretically) variegata spot, does it occur in I. pumila? Or did Jazzamataz get it from I. variegata? I didn't follow the pedigree very far for Zing Me.
On 2/28/2013 8:08 AM, Chuck Chapman wrote:
I pulled out a couple of papers I had on hand. Simonet in doctoral thesis in 1934 looked at a number of aphylla clones. The drawings are in his paper. What was obvious was there was differences in chromosome confirmation. The drawings don't allow good comparison of arm length, but satellites were indicated. Of the 7 shown, 6 had chromosomes with satellites Three had a chromosome pair with satellites on each end. One had 4 pairs of chromosomes with a satellite on each end. One had 4 chromosome pairs with one satellite on one end, one had two chromosomes with one satellite. Satellites are where chromosomes narrow dramatically, and then bulge out with a short length of a wider area. This occurs at the end on some chromosomes in some species, both plants and animals. Another paper "High levels of Genetic diversity in populations of Iris aphylla ....." Wroblewska et al 2003 found a large variation between populations of aphylla studied. Including banding pattern differences on chromosomes. So, there can be chromosome mismatching of aphylla x aphylla crosses as well as aphylla X teraploid with a 12 chromosome full or partial set. Or possibly a full match. Depends on aphylla clone used. And if only a few chromosomes mismatch, sorting out can produce viable offspring in unbalanced chromosome sets. Or amphidiploids in situations with 4 sets of 12 chromosomes. So there is some validity to aphylla X 4n-48 being amphidiploid, but it would appear to be the situation only in some cases, and in others sorting out could produce tetraploids. Chuck Chapman -----Original Message----- From: Bill Chaney <billchaney@ymail.com> To: iris <iris@hort.net> Sent: Wed, Feb 27, 2013 6:41 pm Subject: Re: [iris] Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question) Thanks Tom for the info and insight. I think the aphylla derived MTBs have proven themselves fertile with most classes, with some interesting exceptions, usually one way or the other (ie pollen sterile and pod fertile, or the reverse). I find that interesting from an genetic standpoint and would love to learn more about it. Bill ________________________________ From: Tom Waters <irises@telp.com> To: iris@hort.net Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:41 PM Subject: Re: [iris] Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question) A very typical tet MTB parentage is seen in 'Classic Image'. Of its four grandparent, three are ((aphylla X TB) x TB), the fourth is TB x TB. If aphylla and TB chromosomes were not homologous, those first three grandparents should have been sterile, yet two produced a fertile seedling crossed with each other, and the other produced a fertile seedling crossed with a TB. Furthermore, 'Classic Image' itself is fertile, and when crossed with an (aphylla x TB) seedling produced 'Saucy', which is also fertile. This is not to say that aphylla chromosomes are as homologous with TB chromosomes as the TBs are amongst themselves, just to say the aphylla x TB seedlings behave more like tetraploids than like amphidiploids. Tom Tom Waters Telperion Oasis ~ www.telp.com/irises Cuyamungue, New Mexico, USA (zone 6) ---------------------------------------- From: "Chuck Chapman" <irischapman@aim.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 11:38 AM To: iris@hort.net Subject: Re: [iris] Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question) I'm just going on what I recall. Re-reading the paper would help. But remember we have even more generations of SDB X SDB crosses, and they still are amphidiploids. If mismatching is only a few chromosomes. sorting out will happen over time. If like SDB, number of generations won't make a difference. Chuck Chapman -----Original Message----- From: Tom Waters To: iris Sent: Wed, Feb 27, 2013 12:58 pm Subject: Re: [iris] Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question) Surely not so mismatched as to function as amphidiploids, not with all the hundreds of advanced-generation aphylla/TB hybrids (tet MTBs) that have been produced with multiple backcrossings, etc. Tom Waters Telperion Oasis ~ www.telp.com/irises Cuyamungue, New Mexico, USA (zone 6) ---------------------------------------- From: "Chuck Chapman" Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 5:10 AM To: iris@hort.net Subject: Re: [iris] Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question) I vaguely something. Unfortunately I don't have time this week to look it up. but from what I think I recall, basically it was that aphylla chromosomes didn't match up well with the TB chromomes, even if same number is set. So that crosses with aphylla X TB were amphidiploid. We are very lucky with iris species, with so many being able to cross and be fertile. This is possible with many closely related species that are tetraploids, just because of having two sets of chromosomes, you get amphidploid , and thus fertility. But we also have many diploid interspecies crosses that are fertile. This is not the usual situation with diploids, in the plant kingdom. It is precisely because of this that we are able to combine so many genes and get such a wide variety of plants, colours etc. When I look across so many plant genus, Iris seem to be rater exceptional in number of species that can interbreed and produce fertile offspring. I haven't seen anything even close, in other genus. eg Roses , daylilies, carnations, violets, tomatoes, etc, usually involve no more then about 20 (daylillies) the others are much less. With iris we seem to have at least 100. Chuck Chapman -----Original Message----- From: Bill Chaney To: iris Sent: Tue, Feb 26, 2013 6:25 pm Subject: Re: [iris] Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question) I seem to remember someone once quoting a Bee Warburton article on this issue. Does anyone happen to know if that is true, or better yet have a copy of such an article? I think it was in relation to crosses with I. aphylla specifically. ________________________________ From: Tom Waters To: iris@hort.net Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 1:41 PM Subject: Re: [iris] Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question) There have been observations of four pumila chromosomes pairing with four TB chromosomes in IBs and (I think) 36-chromosome MDBs. These unbalanced tetraploids are not completely infertile by any means, and relatively fertile ones seem to be becoming more common with time, which I have no explanation for. Some used to give a "rule of thumb" that if the bivalents outnumber the univalents, some fertility can be expected. If you have the pairing of four chromosomes I mentioned, an IB has 12+4=16 bivalents, and 8+4=12 univalents. We also see partial fertility in the 1/4 aril arilbreds. I think the supposition is that unpaired chromosomes do not necessarily stop the plant from making gametes, and the unpaired ones just end up in the gametes randomly. It's possible to have a viable plant with one of two extra chromosomes (or one or two missing ones); these are aneuploids. So the fertile gametes from these unbalanced tetraploids are those that randomly receive an approximately complete set. The probability of that is small, but can be great enough to get some good seeds in some cases. Tom Tom Waters Telperion Oasis ~ www.telp.com/irises Cuyamungue, New Mexico, USA (zone 6) ---------------------------------------- From: "Bill Chaney" Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:02 PM To: "iris@hort.net" Subject: Re: [iris] Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question) I don't want to distract the discussion that is ongoing, but I can't resist jumping in when Chuck brings up the 12/12/8/8 ploidy because I am trying to understand how some of these IBs are so fertile with TBs and MTBs. Especially if the 12/12 side comes from aphylla background. Would anyone care to comment on that or point me to a good source of information? Thanks Bill ________________________________ From: Chuck Chapman To: iris@hort.net Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 8:06 AM Subject: Re: [iris] Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question) Amphidiploid is 12/12/8/8 these are SDB There can't be cross overs between any chromosome from 8 set and 12 set, as they never pair up in meiosis. Crossovers only occur in paired chromosomes. No pairs = no crossovers. Like, never ever. If they ever did, their would be unbalanced chromosomes, and it wouldn't be viable. that is the meiotic cell would die, or any zygote formed would die. IB is 12/12/12/8 So can be pumilla spot, on one of the chromosomes from the "8 chromosomes" set. RE; Chocolate Truffle. TB X pumilla = SDB No exceptions. And for kickers, ruffles" a recessive trait that just isn't present in pumilla species. So where are genes for ruffles coming from? Hell's Fire is a reddish black, with multiple dosages of Ae (check pedigree) Thus all seedlings will be purple in a cross with a yellow. So are you still believing this pedigree? Chuck Chapman -----Original Message----- From: Linda Mann To: iris Sent: Tue, Feb 26, 2013 10:41 am Subject: Re: [iris] Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question) Amphidiploid version could. On 2/26/2013 9:09 AM, Chuck Chapman wrote:Thepumilla spot is only on the "8 chromosome" set. So can't show up in TB, Agree, spots are interesting. TB e-register from pumila, first generation. There is another one registered as a TB, but class is probably a typo - it's IB height. Others SDB breeding? fertile IBs? cross overs? CHOCOLATE TRUFFLE (Mark Grumbine, R. 2006) Sdlg. MG04-407-7. TB, 29" (74 cm), EM S. light yellow-brown; F. dark mahogany brown, light yellow area around beards and shoulders; beards orange; ruffled. Hells Fire X I. pumila, yellow eagerly waiting to see the '39 checklist (Mike, any more TBs registered from that era from pumilas?) Are there more? What about the pumila spot work that Blyth was doing, trying to bring spot 'up' to TB size? Zing Me. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- From: C* C* &*
- Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- From: C* C* &*
- Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- References:
- Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- From: B* C* &*
- Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- From: C* C* &*
- Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- Next by Date: Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- Next by thread: Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)