iris@hort.net
- Subject: Re: Re:Auto-tetraploid versus amphidiploid was Hyb spots
- From: B* C* <b*@ymail.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:40:34 -0800 (PST)
I have been doing a LOT of aphylla bred MTB X TB crossing (using the tet MTBs from the Craigs, Hager or Fisher). I have also been doing some aphylla bred MTB X SDB and aphylla bred MTB X IB. One observation from my work and also from Vicki Craig, is that seed counts and germination of the crosses with the SDBs and IBs is lower than with the TBs, but germination will improve if you hold seed pots for a second year. I also see this with diploid X Tetraploid crosses. The aphylla bred MTB X TB crosses produce seed counts and germination rates equal to TB X TB for me. Bill Chaney ________________________________ From: Chuck Chapman <irischapman@aim.com> To: iris@hort.net Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 8:46 AM Subject: [iris] Re:Auto-tetraploid versus amphidiploid was Hyb spots We had been discussing aphylla X TB hybrids and fertility. Actually, it turns out that full tetraploids, (autotetraploids) with four identical genes, have much reduced fertility compared to amphidiploids, or straight diploids. This is because during meiosis (forming of gametes, eggs and pollen) four sets of identical genes often form tetravalents. And during first stage of meiosis, either all of these four genes go into one cell, or the other, leaving no copies in the other cell. When there is small differences in the four sets of genes, of a particular chromosome, you get two bivalents and so proper division during meiosis Now remember, most tetraploid iris, at least the TB iris , have multiple species involved in their creation, so probably a number of genes from different species, with enough of a difference, and enough of a similarity, to pair up as fertile bivalents , rather then tetravalents during meiosis. Also almost all ( I'd say all, but there probably an exception or several out there somewhere) fertile tetraploids found in nature, are a result of an inter species hybrids, and thus are amphidiploids, rather then autotetraploids. So fertile 4x 48 iris are should basically be considered amphidiploids. The infertile ones are probably autotetraploids. Look up "fertility in autotetraploids" Chuck Chapman --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re:Auto-tetraploid versus amphidiploid was Hyb spots
- From: C* C* &*
- Re: Re:Auto-tetraploid versus amphidiploid was Hyb spots
- References:
- Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- From: &* W* &*
- Re:Auto-tetraploid versus amphidiploid was Hyb spots
- From: C* C* &*
- Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- Next by Date: Re: Re:Auto-tetraploid versus amphidiploid was Hyb spots
- Previous by thread: Re: Re:Auto-tetraploid versus amphidiploid was Hyb spots
- Next by thread: Re: Re:Auto-tetraploid versus amphidiploid was Hyb spots