Re: FUCK U!!
- To: Multiple recipients of list <i*@rt66.com>
- Subject: Re: FUCK U!!
- From: "* h* <j*@hotmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 10:15:18 -0700 (MST)
I think that was totally crude and rude. Children could be reading
that.
>From iris-l@rt66.com Mon Feb 9 05:36:07 1998
>Return-Path: <iris-l@rt66.com>
>Received: from news (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> by news.Rt66.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA23600;
> Mon, 9 Feb 1998 06:34:45 -0700 (MST)
>Date: Mon, 9 Feb 1998 06:34:45 -0700 (MST)
>Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19980209072902.00948300@mail.fgi.net>
>Reply-To: iris-l@rt66.com
>Originator: iris-l@rt66.com
>Sender: iris-l@rt66.com
>Precedence: bulk
>From: The Hiltibidals <dutchman@fgi.net>
>To: Multiple recipients of list <iris-l@rt66.com>
>Subject: Re: FUCK U!!
>X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
>X-Comment: Discussion on garden irises
>
>I can't imagine the mind that would go to so much trouble for such a
note.
>Clearly they need some garden therapy.
>Sharon
>
>
>
>
>
>At 06:24 AM 2/9/98 -0700, you wrote:
>>i beleive this is a spam, if you'll notice the sender, Guo Rong, that
would
>>be pronounced: Go Wrong.
>>
>>>Guo Rong <guorong@pacific.net.sg>
>>
>>
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
