Re: Cult: Luminata
- Subject: Re: Cult: Luminata
- From: J* R*
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 12:04:12 -0800
From: "Julia Rankin" <breckenridge@bnis.net>
Well, but I do have to ask! What is the "emerging zonal class", and why is
not Clarence a luminata?
Julia
So. Calif
SZ 1-3
-----Original Message-----
From: Ellen Gallagher <e_galla@moose.ncia.net>
To: iris-talk@onelist.com <iris-talk@onelist.com>
Date: Wednesday, February 24, 1999 10:32 AM
Subject: [iris-talk] Re: Cult: Luminata
>From: Ellen Gallagher <e_galla@moose.ncia.net>
>
> Janet Natale wrote:
>
>>>Don't some consider CLARENCE a near-luminata?
>
> Mike Lowe replied:
>
>>Tough to categorize, as we don't yet have an official definition for
>>zonals, however Clarence misses luminata on a couple of key points and
fits
>>into the emerging zonal class much better.
>
> Thanks for the info...I have been pointing out early-blooming
> CLARENCE as a luminata for three years. I won't even ask about
> "the emerging zonal class". ;)
>
> Ellen
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "One touch of nature makes the
>Ellen Gallagher / e_galla@moose.ncia.net whole world kin"
>Northern New Hampshire, USA / Zone 3
>Berlin, NH in 'The Great North Woods'
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>To subscribe to Siberian iris e-mail robin:
>http://www.onelist.com/subscribe.cgi/sibrob
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Explore a new interest; start a new hobby. Go to http://www.onelist.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Suggestions on how we can improve ONElist? Go to the 'Suggestion'
box on our new web site. http://www.onelist.com
