RE: AIS: What is "introduction"?
On 6 Jan 00, at 9:33, Chris Hollinshead wrote:
>
> I think that the INTENT of the regulation is to get the info to the
> registrar. Whether it is; an original ad torn from the catalog, a
> photocopy of the ad, a printout of the web ad from the web catalog, etc
> etc. The originality of the information would seem irrelevant. The
> advising of the registrar along with some sort of credible back up
> material to substantiate the introduction claim is the relevant part.
>
> Christopher Hollinshead
> Mississauga, Ontario Canada zone6b
Of course, Chris, that is the intent. I have had too many antibiotics!
My question concerns 'delayed registrations/introductions.' Several
years ago Bernice Miller sent several registrations to a western
supplier, and these irises were sold and otherwise distributed, but
it wasn't until some time later that they were officially recorded as
introduced as Bernice had entered a retirement home shortly after
sending the irises to CA. The time frame for correction in this case
was two years if I remember correctly. MY FRIEND JONATHAN and
PRISCILLA OF CORINTH were the two Miller irises that were 'delayed.'
As a result, the irises never appeared on the awards list. Is this a
standard AIS penalty?
I can understand why HATSU-KAGAMI, a 1966 introduction, but
something like a 1994 registration was never on the awards list.
Does a 'delayed registration/introduction' automatically rule out
such an iris from receiving an award?
Walter Moores
Enid Lake, MS 7/8
--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
GRAB THE GATOR! FREE SOFTWARE DOES ALL THE TYPING FOR YOU!
Tired of filling out forms and remembering passwords? Gator fills in
forms and passwords with just one click! Comes with $50 in free coupons!
<a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/gator4 ">Click Here</a>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
