Re: CULT: Weather and Judges
- To: B*@aol.com, i*@egroups.com
- Subject: Re: [iris-talk] CULT: Weather and Judges
- From: w*
- Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 06:39:40 -0600
- Priority: normal
On 31 Dec 00, at 21:52, BigAlligator@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 12/31/00 9:06:44 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> claire235@aol.com writes:
>
> << Judges view the show and most will always try to be fair. 0ften
> extenuating circumstances are taken into consideration. However
> do you really want an iris with tears or other faults to be upgraded to a
> blue? >>
>
> Claire,
> Most judges I saw in Kentucky did as you do, but I have heard
> complaints after a bad bloom season. There are two sides to this issue,
> and a "compromise" in the middle is probably best.
>
> Mark A. Cook
> BigAlligator@aol.com
> Dunnellon, Florida [Clear, 22 F]
I, too, am talking about those judges who are uncompromising and
judge strictly by the book, not allowing for one spot on a leaf or an
insignificant tear because of unfavorable weather conditions we've
already named.
No, I would not want Raggedy Ann or Dirty Sally to be given a blue or
QOS.
Walter Moores
Enid Lake, MS USA 7/8
