HYB: Chuck's hose/pigment analogy
- Subject: [iris] HYB: Chuck's hose/pigment analogy
- From: Linda Mann l*@volfirst.net
- Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:09:41 -0500
- List-archive: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris/> (Web Archive)
Thought while I was at it, I would cross post this one with a different
subject line as well:
< Some information here to help us with an analysis. The distribution
of
factors such as intensity of yellow or can be viewed
as continuous or
discreet. Discrete can be in steps. Look at the
heights of bearded iris, all
types from pumila to the tall TBs at 40"+. This forms
a continuum and
plotting on a graph with height being the horizontal
axis and the number at
each height being the vertical axis , we would end up
with a curve.
Most factors in nature have what is called a normal
distribution of variance.
That is all the various small factors making up an
item cause a variation.
The more factors the narrower the curve, the more
factors the wider the
curve.
We know that we have several different
classifications of height/type
classifications of bearded iris EG: MDB, SDB, IB, BB,
TB etc. If this was
only a discrete difference then all MDB would be 6",
all SDB 12" etc. This is
obviously not the case. The plot of height versus
distribution would give us
several peaks. One for each median (average) height
for that class. Thatr is
there would be a peak for MDB, for SDB IB, TB and
minor peaks for MTB and BB
(not as many varieties and numbers count). Thus we
are dealing with both
discrete and continuous. Genetically MDB, SDB, IB and
TB are different. They
all have different sets of genes. The Iris pumila has
four sets of 8 genes
8/8/8/8 and in crosses with TB 12/12/12/12 have
produced MDB 8/8/8/12, SDB
8/8/12/12, IB 8/12/12/12. each one of these types
could produce their own
normal distribution curves ( I'm ignoring judging and
registration rules here
and focusing on genetic classification) that are very
smooth without any sub
peaks or any skewing (more on one side of the
median(average) then the
other). Thus if we didn't know the genetics (or have
the parentage) we would
have to classify an unknown into a category based on
its height ( for the
moment I'm ignoring the other information I might
have). Thus an iris 16"in
height would be classified into SDB even if it is IB
genetically, just on the
lower end of its scale. An SDB that is 7" tall would
be classified as an MDB
even if it is genetically an SDB. If we had the
parentage we would be able to
more accurately assess what it is genetically.
The same principals apply to dissecting a cross with
as much variance as this
one. When it comes to analysing the category we place
something in both
factors have to be considered. FoF would seem to be
tttt, but is more
apricot-yellow then pink. We use this knowledge to
place seedling #4 into
tttt category , although other interpretations are
possible.
The same with looking at the amount of yellow and
amount of blue in each
seedling.
The removal of anthocyanin is referred to either
Dominant reduction of
anthocyanin ( not referred to a complete removal of
anthocyanin) referred to
as "I", or recessive removal of anthocyanin . To
tell which, (dominant or
recessive) look at parents and look at the seedlings,
trying to ignore other
factors, and keep in mind what else may mask the
factor we are looking at.
The yellow is more complicated as Robin noted. I
have some evidence that the
cream (flavanoid pigments) and beta-carotene and
alpha-carotene may act
independently and may be what is referred to as y1,
y2, y3.
With anthocyanin there is about 20 steps in
production of anthocyanin from
its colourless precursors into the visible form. This
is like a garden hose
with 20 shut off valves in it. If any one is turned
off, the water
(anthocyanin) doesn't come out the other end. In
various plants about 8 of
these steps have been blocked. In iris there are
several, more then 3 and
less then 6, that can turn off production.
With the yellows, the cream flavanoid seems to be
completely independent from
the other yellows, no shared precursor, a different
chemical chain.
With the carotenoids it is like we have one garden
hose coming from the tap
with a "Y" junction at some point ( chemical
biosynthesis info, not just
observation). Now put at least one tap in each line.
Thus you can cut off the
main tap, no beta or alpha carotene. You can turn one
of the "Y" branch taps
and remove either apha or beta-carotene or you can
turn both off at the y
branches to remove both, the same as turning off the
main tap.
I hope this helps but I'm afraid it may confuse
everyone. I don't have any
pictures of normal distributions curves handy to post
, other wise I would.
Chuck Chapman>
--
Linda Mann east Tennessee USA zone 7/8
East Tennessee Iris Society <http://www.korrnet.org/etis>
American Iris Society web site <http://www.irises.org>
talk archives: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris-talk/>
photos archives: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris-photos/>
online R&I <http://www.irisregister.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index