Re: OT:NEEDS Breathing New Life Into An Old Club
- Subject: Re: [iris] OT:NEEDS Breathing New Life Into An Old Club
- From: C*@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:34:41 EST
- List-archive: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris/> (Web Archive)
In a message dated 1/25/05 1:23:49 AM Eastern Standard Time,
jbruce1@cinci.rr.com writes:
<< I do wish there was a way AIS could better promote and educate from a
national level. >>
As I have said in this forum before, although not recently, I think this is
the crux of the matter.
Because the national organization does not adequately articulate and carry
forth its own public mission--which is an admirable and workable one-- it cannot
serve as an example to the grassroots, and because no one at the grassroots
understands what being part of the larger organization means, or understands
AIS' real purpose and importance, they can't draw on its strength, and AIS fails
at the local level, and quite probably at the Regional one as well. I'd like
to see a progressive, activist AIS emerge, something plugged into the broader
contemporary horticultural scene.
Most AIS' work must be done at the local level, and that is where AIS, for
better or for worse, shows its human face, the face of its members. But for that
work to get done, the members have to understand what it is, and why it is
what it is, and they have to believe in it, and enjoy doing it, one step at a
time, one show at a time, one gardener at a time.
If there is no, what shall I call it-- philosophical foundation-- to what is
going on, local members will just go through the motions, or not as the case
may be, and soon the fun dries up and it gets boring, and the bickering and
stirring starts, and members who, inconceivable as it may sound, would rather pay
their twenty bucks a year for burgers or flowers than to listen to that
stuff, just drift away.
It is, however, well to remember that many folks aren't interested in much
beyond their own frame of reference, which is not to say they are selfish or
solipsistic or narrow or dumb. They have a limited idea of what an Iris Society
is supposed to mean for them, and they are never going to be interested in any
big picture, never going to think taking the message of Great Irises to the
public is fun, never going to see much beyond the next free rhizome, never going
to understand the meaning of Affiliation with AIS, and that is fine, so long
as the whole AIS is not operating on that level. But it seems clear to me that
because AIS is not doing what some folks think it should be doing when such
is not what it was formed to do does not mean that it is failing. It may mean
that it needs to reexamine its goals, and its progress in meeting them.
<<uninformed and sometimes baseless criticism.>>
I do think anyone stepping up to offer substantial criticism of an
organization or individual really should scrupulously confirm the factual basis of their
argument.
Now, I think I shall sign off on this subject, or as some might say, drift
away.
Anner Whitehead
Richmond VA USA
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index