Re: REF: Translingual registrations
- Subject: Re: REF: Translingual registrations
- From: C*@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:31:25 EST
- List-archive: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris/> (Web Archive)
In a message dated 1/15/2007 4:42:02 PM Eastern Standard Time,
Cseggen1@aol.com writes:
<<I am often befuddled by your writing but on this subject I agree!
I befuddle myself sometimes, Connie. You are not missing much, truth to
tell. As to definitions, note that deceit as such is not always a component of
the word. It can also just mean a discussion that appears valid, but is not
very sound.
<<Is it really all that important?
Yes, I think questions involving registration are always important. I am
not, however, convinced that there is a crisis here. Griff, on the other hand,
is not so sure. Mike Lowe would be the one to ask, as he knows with what
frequency, if any, the code of rules with which he works fails to apply to the
real cases at hand.
<<One would think that if a hybridizer spent as much time as it takes to
introduce a new iris, that person would do all they could to be certain the
name was not confused with another hybridizers product. And that's all I have
to say about that!
Yes, you would think so.
I hear the weather is terrible in Missouri. Take care.
Cordially,
Anner Whitehead
Richmond VA USA
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index