iris@hort.net
- Subject: Re: OT : Iriswiki and copyright
- From: J* I* J* <j*@usjoneses.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:41:37 -0800
And don't forget the fair use provisions of copyright law. John On Jan 21, 2010, at 7:56 PM, Steve Szabo wrote:
IANAL, but, the way I understand copyright is that you hold the copyright onyour IP unless you relinquish it to another person with or withoutremuneration. AIS can hold the copyright on any publication in which your description is used, but does not hold the copyright on your description, solong as they have your permission to use it as such. There is a publication I used to write for on an occasional basis. Allarticles appearing in this magazine retained to original author's copyright, and the writers were compensated for this use under the condition that the article was not published elsewhere before it was published in the magazine.occasionally contain an article that had been previously published in the magazine. It is my understanding that those authors were compensated againFrom time to time, they would issue special publications that wouldfor the use of the article, and the copyright still remained with theoriginal authors. The publications also carried a copyright as a compilationwork.It has been years since I have written for the publication, but it is my understanding that the copyrights remain with the authors. Anyone wishing to republish the material would need to get permission of the author to do so. The magazine also contained a number of columns that were written by the same person each issue (different columns, different authors). I do not knowwho held the copyright in those instances, but I suspect it was the publication from a few conversations I had with the editor when he was trying to get me to write a column, which I turned down.Copyright is a tricky critter. If you have any real questions about it andits use, then you would need to really consult with an attorney who specializes in such stuff. \\Steve// -----Original Message-----From: owner-iris@hort.net [o*@hort.net] On Behalf Of JohnBruce Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:44 PM To: iris@hort.net Subject: [iris] OT : Iriswiki and copyright I have been following the development of the iriswiki and the currentcontroversy with a great deal of interest. I have seen some comments thathavemade me feel I needed to post something and possibly get clarification on oropen up broader dialogue on. This is a little long, so if you have no interest simply hit the delete key. One issue is the concern over using official R&I descriptions in the iriswiki,particularly copyright infringement and intellectual property infringement.Asa hybridizer I grow and evaluate seedlings. I decide what cross to make and which resultant seedling will be introduced. Until I sell or give that plant out there is no doubt that it is MY property and a result of my physical and intellectual intervention upon mother nature. I also create the description and deliver the other information necessary to complete the registrationform,so one would have to assume that that description is really MY intellectual property. I also pay a fee for the registrar to process that information and publish it in printed materials known as Checklists, which I then purchase.I do not have a problem with this. I also pay a yearly fee to access the onlinechecklist for the ease of checking names and researching parentages. Again,Ihave no problem with this fee. I certainly hope the AIS at least recoupsthe cost of producing the print checklists, including compensation for theregistrar and storefront. I also hope the AIS at a minimum covers the costsof keeping the electronic checklists going. If there is cash left over,great...it can be used for enhancements or to help in other areas. Where Ihave a problem is with the concept that the AIS owns the intellectual property and copyright over these entries, to wit that they may not be used for anotherAIS venture such as the wiki or catalogs. If I introduce the iris, does this mean I am violating a copyright for using the R&I entry I created? Do I need"express written consent of the copyright holder" before I do this?I certainly understand protecting the information, particularly from other entities profiting from it such as Dave's Garden (which by the way refusestocorrect information even when provided by the hybridizer themself). However,one needs to consider that something like the iriswiki will serve the functionof the AIS to promote irises, and to a vast audience which the 8000 or so members of the AIS pales to in comparison. People will see irises and learn about them, reduce frustration by knowing what may not grow in what area,etc.I grow daylilies....their cultivar info is available in many places on the 'net for free. I also believe the fee for registering a daylily cultivar is optional. Unless it has changed, only North American hybridizers must payfor registrations...I am not sure I understand that one. Anyway, the Hemerocallis Society doesn't seem to be having as many woes as AIS.I have talked with many people who are current and past members of AIS. I ama"past" member myself. There are many who feel that AIS is far too slow to change and somewhat elitist. There is annually the discussion about falling membership and cash flow. A free dissemination of information such as theiriswiki is certainly not going to add much to the demise of the organization,but it could very well aid it. Dinosaurs ruled the earth for 300 millionyearsuntil the lack of ability to adapt to changing conditions made them extinct.My .02 for what it's worth. John Bruce --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
- References:
- OT : Iriswiki and copyright
- From: &* B* &*
- RE: OT : Iriswiki and copyright
- From: &* S* &*
- OT : Iriswiki and copyright
- Prev by Date: RE: OT : Iriswiki and copyright
- Next by Date: Re: OT : Iriswiki and copyright
- Previous by thread: RE: OT : Iriswiki and copyright
- Next by thread: Re: OT : Iriswiki and copyright