iris@hort.net
- Subject: Re: Decadence and the AIS awards system
- From: B* W* <a*@aol.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:12:09 -0500 (EST)
If I recall properly, Keith introduced it first and then it was introduced later by Barry. This would make it eligible. Of course, my memory could be getting faulty. I am 30+ ! ;-)
In addition . . . a change should be made to the 7th edition of the Judges Handbook so that it matches. Page 28, under The Dykes Memorial Medal (headline about 2/3 down the page). It states that elgibility is determined by where it was introduced first (underlined) REGARDLESS OF ORIGIN.
The handbook should match the decree. Betty Wilkerson Zone 6 KY autmirislvr@aol.com -----Original Message----- From: Dave Silverberg <sil1812@molalla.net> To: iris <iris@hort.net> Sent: Wed, Jan 11, 2012 4:48 pm Subject: Re: [iris] Decadence and the AIS awards system I am about to make what may be a major faux pas (read open mouth - - - insert foot!) According to AIS Iris Register Decadence was co-introduced by both Keppel and Blyth in 2004. According to the current Judge's Handbook (2007 edition) quote "The Dykes Medal for America is awarded annually by the British Iris Society through the American Iris Society, and is restricted to irises FIRST introduced in the U.S. or Canada REGARDLESS of origin." end quote (The caps are mine and only first is underlined in the Handbook.) I suppose we could be picky and say that because of dual introduction that is was not specifically introduced in the U.S. BUT, under the rules governing the awarding of the Dykes Medal, at the time of introduction, it may be argued that its introduction in the U.S. in 2004 did indeed meet the requirements for being awarded the Dykes Medal should the AIS judges vote it the award since the Handbook (in 2007) is silent on the point of dual introduction. I can't say that Decadence has always performed well for me. When first acquired it didn't seem to like where it was planted. Two years later I transplanted it into another bed about 15 feet away. It is now performing up to what I deem to be its potential for an award winning iris. Dave Silverberg ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michhle BERSILLON" <auxiris5@orange.fr> To: <iris@hort.net> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 10:41 AM Subject: [iris] Decadence and the AIS awards system
Not to annoy anyone, but Decadence isn't eligible for the Dykes
Medal; the
highest award it could hope for is the Wister medal (not that I think
it
deserves this) because it is an iris that was bred and developed in Australia. The American Dykes medal is ONLY for irises bred and
developed
in the United States or Canada. Please remember that the "American"
Dykes
medal is a British Iris Society award that is offered through the
AIS.
There are two other Dykes medals: the one offered to Australian and
(I
think) New Zealand irises that is exclusively for those plants bred
and
developed there and and the other available to either British or
European
irises, provided the breeder is a member of the BIS. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
- Prev by Date: Re: Decadence and the AIS awards system
- Next by Date: Decadence and the AIS awards system
- Previous by thread: Decadence and the AIS awards system
- Next by thread: re: Decadence and the AIS awards system