Hi Laetitia; Incredible - I was going
to write and talk about our dead HIPS forum. And we all agree. if
your site goes down - people go elsewhere and it is very hard to
get them back.
I said I don't want to beat up people wanting to use Facebook and
whatever else social site. But this the fact, those places are for
profit. OK fine. Business is business. But if irisarians want to
help their community, they have an obligation to support their
nonprofit service providers. Not abandon them LOL I'm worked up
over this.
Shaub
On 1/8/2016 10:00 AM, Laetitia Munro wrote:
Hello All. Don't usually participate in these
discussions but I felt I should add my two cents as well. This
is Laetitia the webmaster from the HIPS site, where I believe
we are also having the same problems of lack of participation
with our HIPS forum.
It used to be a busier place, and a great way to network
with like minds. Because the Forum was down for months, I
believed that had something to do with current lack of
participation. Then we went into the holiday/winter/dormant
iris season so I thought, perhaps there is less interest,
because people have other more pressing things to attend to. I
never thought it was Facebook robbing us of our audience, but
now that you mention, it, its possible. I also go on Facebook
for iris discussions, but to me they are two entirely
different venues. However Facebook to me is like WalMart,
while an Iris Discussion board is a boutique. Do I hate
Walmart? No, I go there all the time, as well as to my
favorite boutiques. I want them both. In other words, there
should be room for more than one Iris discussion board. I also
know some irisarians who would never use Facebook, because it
such a public 'commercial' and spam laden place.
As for now the Historic Iris Forum will continue, and with
the Spring coming, and one's thoughts turn more to gardening,
'boutique' Forum discussion boards will become more active.
We'll see. We need both WalMart and the boutique; snuffing out
one would rob the world of a valuable communication tool. I
guess we'll see.
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:17:46 -0500
To: i*@hort.net
Subject: Re: OT-CHAT: [iris] Active?
From: 1*@rewrite.hort.net
I do agree
with Shaub that diversity allows for people to have what
they want. It would be crazy to fight Facebook. But each
of us finds what best suits our needs. As I said ,I have
considered the Forum model and would be willing to
advocate to adding that to our AIS selections so long as I
would not be embarrassed by its lack of use. I would not
consider eliminating Iris Talk but sadly it seems to have
little support anymore and I have no control ober that
decision. Iris Talk is provided by Chris Lindsey who runs
Hort Net. At some point Chris may decide to give up on it
if it does not get the audience. Currently I do not know
how he finances it. Unfortunately the world changes and
what some of us perceive as good things disappear if the
rest of the world does not care. I am not trying to sound
an alarm who knows how long something will last, including
the iris society. But if too few value something it is
hard to sustain it.
From:
"Shaub Dunkley" 4*@rewrite.hort.net
To: i*@hort.net
Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2016 11:02:15 PM
Subject: Re: OT-CHAT: [iris] Active?
I was being rather
polemical to see if I could stir up a little
conversation. Beating up that AIS dare use it and that
AIS does not have a forum. But it's true I have close
to no experience engaging with Facebook and don't care
for the model. But it has a place and a function. Not
just THE place and THE function. Neither would a forum
be THE place as well. World of Irises brought in the
same.
So Facebook and World of Irises are what they are,
I'll not criticize one's right to enjoy them. But I
keep hearing people say "everybody that used to be
here (and with whom we talked) have gone to Facebook".
So I go to Facebook and I haven't figured out where
that conversational equivalent is. Is it there and I
don't know how to find it? Does one have to Sign Up to
get to it? This is all part of the bigger shift in
culture as to how we talk and engage. Iris folks will
on large follow the same behaviors as similar
demographics. More flash, less words. Or if there are
words we make it in snippets and platitudes.
You can lead a horse to water but .... I'm just
concerned people who used to care for discussion are
either too busy or too jaded about the whole thing to
talk even if we gave them the perfect vehicle. It will
not be long before some of our best dialogues will be
had with artificial intelligence that are more excited
about the human narrative than the humans are. Reap as
you sow.
Shaub
On 1/7/2016 8:46 PM, Robert Pries wrote:
I totally
agree with everyone so far. I much prefer Iris Talk
to Facebook. But look at where the AIS members are,
mostly on Facebook. A few years ago I asked John how
many people are on Iris Talk. If I remember
correctly that was about 80. Presently we have 4 in
this discussion. I can tell you as a Facebook
Administrator a post on Facebook gets at minimum 80
people viewing it and often it is passed on to 1500
more people. I would not give up on Iris Talk since
I find it easier to communicate ideas. But it seems
that is not what the majority of people wish today.
It also seems most do not wish to be confronted with
ideas, pictures yes, but thoughtful discussion No!
It is sort of a new brand of illiteracy! It is good
to hear from Colleen again!----Bob
From:
0*@rewrite.hort.net
To: i*@hort.net
Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2016 6:10:08 PM
Subject: Re: OT-CHAT: [iris] Active?
Well, I guess I'm in good company, then. My
thoughts re: Facebook mirror yours, Shaub.
Plus I think the whole "like" business is
ridiculous. In no way do I become a better
person if 100 rather than 10 people "like" me.
Just my 2 cents worth,
Dorothy Stiefel
Spencer, NY
P.S. Hi, Linda. You are right. Very long
time, no talk!
=====================================================================
In a message dated 1/6/2016 9:35:08 P.M.
Eastern Standard Time, 4*@rewrite.hort.net
writes:
sigh.
I am one of those people who refuses to
use Facebook. I read the
'terms and conditions' of that dubiously
intentioned place and cannot
understand why people would want their
organization's core discourse to
get sucked into that for-profit black
hole. The central idea is to have
people create content at no cost to
Facebook. Content to promote profit
making. Drifting to the lowest common
denominator - fast-food
'McDonald's' discourse.
--
Bob Pries
Zone 7a
Roxboro, NC
(336)597-8805
|
This
email has been sent from a virus-free computer
protected by Avast.
www.avast.com |
--
Bob Pries
Zone 7a
Roxboro, NC
(336)597-8805
|
This email
has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by
Avast.
www.avast.com
|
|
This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. www.avast.com
|
|