Re: Limit term VARIEGATION to foliage
- To: Multiple recipients of list <i*@rt66.com>
- Subject: Re: Limit term VARIEGATION to foliage
- From: C*@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 07:00:33 -0700 (MST)
In a previous message, I said:
<<
<< I agree with Brad's idea of limiting the term "variegation" to foliage,
but
surely we could come up with a more exciting term that "broken colour"??
(-:
>>
Brad then responded with:
You may use any term you wish to describe them, but for the purpose of
communication can we please use "broken color" (BC)?
Confusion isn't always the best policy,
>>
I think it would be fair to ask AIS to make a policy decision on this, as
there is obviously scope for confusion amongst lay-people (i.e.
non-listers!). Clarence - are you there?
Graham Spencer
croftway@aol.com
