Re: LODESTAR (was COMP: database update)
- To: i*@onelist.com
- Subject: Re: LODESTAR (was COMP: database update)
- From: d*@tso.cin.ix.net (Dennis Kramb)
- Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1999 16:09:12 -0500
From: dkramb@tso.cin.ix.net (Dennis Kramb)
>Apparently LODESTAR is a difficult iris to pigeonhole according to the
>contemporary classification system, but nowhere is there a suggestion that
>it should be considered as an MTB. Could this be a case where, as with more
>than a few other historics, there is more than one cultivar circulating
>under the name "LODESTAR"?
I will get a jpeg posted to my web page later this week for everyone to
have a peek of the iris under debate. I remember seeing a pic of a recent
award winning MTB and thought to myself, that looks exactly like my
LODESTAR. I'll dig through my books, etc. and see if I can find that pic
again.
Dennis Kramb; dkramb@tso.cin.ix.net
Cincinnati, Ohio USA; USDA Zone 6; AIS Region 6
Member of AIS, ASI, HIPS, RIS, SIGNA, SLI, & Miami Valley Iris Society
Primary Interests: ABs, REBs, LAs, Native Ohio SPEC and SPEC-X hybrids
(Check out my web page at http://home.fuse.net/dkramb/home.html)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, or to change your subscription
to digest, go to the ONElist web site, at http://www.onelist.com and
select the User Center link from the menu bar on the left.
